Board of Nursing v. Long-Romero
24CA0427
Colo. Ct. App.Nov 14, 2024Background
- Shari L. Long-Romero is a registered certified nurse midwife who received disciplinary action by the Colorado State Board of Nursing after two infant deaths under her care.
- The Board charged Romero with violating various provisions of the Nurse and Nurse Aide Practice Act, including failing to meet patient safety standards and recordkeeping requirements.
- Initially, an administrative law judge found Romero violated the Act and imposed significant restrictions on her license, which the Board affirmed.
- On her first appeal, the Colorado Court of Appeals reversed portions of the Board’s decision (related to lack of notice and procedural issues) but upheld findings that she had violated standards of care and patient safety.
- On remand, Romero argued that a new hearing before the administrative law judge was required, but the Board instead struck the reversed violations and reimposed the original sanctions for the affirmed violations.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Board violated the appellate remand | Board had to hold new hearing | Remand was general, hearing not required | Board acted within discretion; no new hearing required |
| Whether due process required a new hearing | Needed to remedy violations | Due process cured by reversing erroneous findings | No further remedy needed; reversing findings sufficient |
| Appropriateness of sanctions without a new hearing | Sanctions need new proceedings | Allowed to reimpose original sanctions | Sanctions were proper; Board within authority |
| Scope of Board’s discretion on remand | Limited by appellate ruling | Board retains general discretion on general remand | Board had broad discretion on remand |
Key Cases Cited
- Musgrave v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 762 P.2d 686 (Colo. App. 1988) (distinguishes specific from general remands and agency discretion)
- Colo. State Bd. of Med. Exam’rs v. Ogin, 56 P.3d 1233 (Colo. App. 2002) (agency discretion in imposing sanctions and structure of Board panels)
- Colo. Real Est. Comm’n v. Hanegan, 947 P.2d 933 (Colo. 1997) (scope of judicial review over agency-imposed sanctions)
