History
  • No items yet
midpage
Board of County Commissioners of Kay County, Oklahoma v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
956 F. Supp. 2d 184
D.D.C.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Kay County, Oklahoma sued FHFA (as conservator), Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac seeking payment of Oklahoma documentary stamp (transfer) taxes on property sales.
  • Oklahoma law requires sellers to purchase documentary stamps and affix them to deeds for recording; the tax is measured by the value of conveyed real property.
  • Kay County alleges Defendants refused to pay and seeks declaratory judgment and damages for unpaid transfer taxes.
  • Defendants moved to dismiss, arguing federal statutes exempt FHFA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac from "all taxation" (except property taxes).
  • The central legal question is whether the federal exemption from "all taxation" covers state and local real estate transfer (excise) taxes.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether FHFA/Fannie/Freddie are exempt from Oklahoma transfer tax "All taxation" excludes excise/transfer taxes or transfer tax is a property tax "All taxation" covers state/local transfer/recordation taxes imposed on the entities Court: Exemption covers transfer tax; complaint dismissed
Whether transfer tax qualifies as a property tax exception Transfer tax is measured by property value and thus falls within property-tax exception Transfer tax is an excise/transaction tax, not a property tax Court: Transfer tax is not a property tax; exception inapplicable
Whether Wells Fargo alters interpretation to limit "all taxation" to direct taxes Relies on Wells Fargo to argue "all taxation" means only direct taxation Argues Wells Fargo addressed tax-exempt PROPERTY context and is inapposite to entity exemptions Court: Bismarck and related authority control; Wells Fargo not controlling here
Whether courts elsewhere have reached similar results Points to contrary district rulings Points to numerous courts and the Sixth Circuit construing "all taxation" broadly Court: Adopts the uniform line of authority finding exemption applies

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, 485 U.S. 351 (distinguishing direct vs. excise taxes; addressed tax-exempt property)
  • County of Oakland v. FHFA, 716 F.3d 935 (6th Cir.) (construed "all taxation" to exempt entities from state transfer taxes)
  • Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co., 314 U.S. 95 (construed entity tax exemption to include sales taxes)
  • Pittman v. Home Owners’ Loan Corp., 308 U.S. 21 (construed identical exemption to bar documentary stamp taxes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Board of County Commissioners of Kay County, Oklahoma v. Federal Housing Finance Agency
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Jul 26, 2013
Citation: 956 F. Supp. 2d 184
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2012-1283
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.