Bluestein v. Central Wisconsin Anesthesiology, S.C.
769 F.3d 944
7th Cir.2014Background
- Bluestein, a physician-shareholder and board member of Central Wisconsin Anesthesiology, began as an employee in 1996 but became a full partner/shareholder and director in 1999 with equal voting rights and profit sharing.
- Shariff policies and bylaws applied uniformly to all physician-shareholders; major decisions were made by majority vote of the shareholder-board.
- Bluestein submitted an open-ended medical leave request after injuring herself; the board denied the open-ended leave and offered two alternatives, including a four-month leave with potential termination.
- Bluestein was terminated after shareholder votes, with deferred compensation paid afterward; she sued for ADA, Rehabilitation Act, and Title VII discrimination.
- The district court granted summary judgment for Central Wisconsin, holding Bluestein an employer, and awarded attorneys’ fees; Bluestein appeals both the merits and the fees.
- The Seventh Circuit reviews summary judgment de novo and reviews fee awards for abuse of discretion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Bluestein was an employee protected by the statutes | Bluestein argues she was an employee due to board role and contract. | Central Wisconsin contends Bluestein was an employer given equal board control and profit/loss sharing. | Bluestein was an employer as a matter of law. |
| Whether Bluestein raised genuine issues on disability and sex discrimination | Bluestein asserts genuine issues of disability and sex discrimination exist. | Court found no disability or similarly situated male comparator; no merit to sex claim. | Merits of discrimination claims were not reached because Bluestein was an employer. |
| Whether the district court abused its discretion in awarding fees | Bluestein argues fee award was improper or premature. | Court properly awarded fees for frivolous, unreasonable, and unfounded suit. | Fees on appeal affirmed; district court did not abuse its discretion. |
Key Cases Cited
- Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. Wells, 538 U.S. 440 (U.S. 2003) (establishes the six-factor test for employee status in the ADA context)
- Schmidt v. Ottawa Medical Center, P.C., 322 F.3d 461 (7th Cir. 2003) (shared control and equal voting can still render shareholder-employers)
- EEOC v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, 315 F.3d 696 (7th Cir. 2002) (demonstrates considerations of executive control in professional corporations)
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1978) (test for awarding fees to prevailing defendants)
- Munson v. Milwaukee Bd. of School Directors, 969 F.2d 266 (7th Cir. 1992) (discretionary standard for fee awards in discrimination cases)
