History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 Ohio 3176
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Bland appeals denial of reimbursement for $541.12 in expenses under R.C. 4123.512(F) after a successful workers’ compensation appeal.
  • Trial court already awarded Bland $4,789.80 in reasonable expenses but denied the disputed $541.12 as ordinary overhead.
  • The contested expenses include photocopies, postage, meals, parking, mileage, fax, and a “file initiation” charge supposedly related to Bland’s appeal.
  • AT&T contested several items as ordinary business costs not directly tied to Bland’s appeal.
  • Court adopts Kilgore, Schuller, and Paris framework to determine whether expenses are reimbursable and, if so, whether they are reasonably necessary and reasonable.
  • Court remands to determine whether the specific reimbursable expenses (photocopies, postage, meals, parking) were reasonable in amount; the file-initiation expense is left unresolved for lack of evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether certain expenses are reimbursable under RC 4123.512(F). Bland; expenses are directly related to appeal and traditionally charged to clients. AT&T; expenses are ordinary costs of doing business, not directly tied to the appeal. Some expenses (photocopies, postage, meals, parking) are reimbursable.
Whether the file initiation expense is reimbursable. Bland; the expense is tied to the appeal. Not proven or not clearly related to the appeal. Expense not shown to be traditionally charged to clients or directly related; not reimbursed on record.
Whether the amount of the reimbursable expenses was reasonable. Reimbursable expenses were reasonable to achieve effective appeal. Costs should reflect reasonable, not excessive, charges. Remand to determine reasonableness of the reimbursable expenses.

Key Cases Cited

  • Kilgore v. Chrysler Corp., 92 Ohio St.3d 184 (Ohio 2001) (defines reimbursable costs and direct relation to appeal under RC 4123.512(F))
  • Schuller v. U.S. Steel Corp., 103 Ohio St.3d 157 (Ohio 2004) (broad interpretation of 'cost of any legal proceedings' and necessity to relate to the appeal)
  • Moore v. General Motors Corp., Terex Div., 18 Ohio St.3d 259 (Ohio 1985) (liberal construction of workers’ compensation statutes and costs bearing direct relation to appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bland v. Ryan
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 13, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 3176; 977 N.E.2d 107; 24826
Docket Number: 24826
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Bland v. Ryan, 2012 Ohio 3176