History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bitz v. A.B.
792 N.W.2d 539
N.D.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • A.P.B. (father) appeals an order terminating parental rights after a juvenile court found the child deprived and that deprivation was likely to continue.
  • The child, born March 22, 2007, lost his mother to murder in 2010; the father was incarcerated at birth and later moved to Washington.
  • The child was placed in foster care and then with relatives while social services sought a deprivation finding and termination of rights.
  • Social workers and a therapist described the child’s severe emotional trauma and need for a stable, non-violent home.
  • The juvenile court found the child deprived, that deprivation would continue, and that the child would suffer likely harm absent termination; it terminated the father’s parental rights; the father appeals.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the child is a deprived child A.B. argues deprived status not shown A.P.B. contends care provided elsewhere undermines deprivation Yes, deprived child found
Whether deprivation likely to continue A.B. asserts future improvement possible A.P.B. claims capacity to improve exists Yes, prognosis supports continuation of deprivation
Whether termination was supported by probable harm A.B. argues no clear harm if W.R. with father A.P.B. claims no imminent harm Yes, probable ongoing harm without termination
Whether reasonable reunification efforts were made A.B. asserts efforts were adequate A.P.B. argues more efforts could be explored Yes, social services' efforts were reasonable
Whether the State made adequate prognostic and professional evidence A.B. says evidence weak A.P.B. contends evidence insufficient Yes, prognosis supported by professionals

Key Cases Cited

  • Interest of A.B., 767 N.W.2d 817 (2009 ND 116) (clear and convincing standard and deprecation analysis)
  • Interest of T.A., 722 N.W.2d 548 (2006 ND 210) (prob prognostic evidence considerations)
  • Interest of T.J.O., 462 N.W.2d 631 (1990 ND) (deprivation and continuation analysis)
  • Interest of A.S., 733 N.W.2d 232 (2007 ND 83) (consideration of professional opinions in prognosis)
  • Interest of K.J., 779 N.W.2d 635 (2010 ND 46) (reiteration of prognostic evidence and cooperation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bitz v. A.B.
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 21, 2010
Citation: 792 N.W.2d 539
Docket Number: Nos. 20100351, 20100352
Court Abbreviation: N.D.