Bevilacqua v. Rodriguez
460 Mass. 762
Mass.2011Background
- Bevilacqua filed a try title petition in the Land Court seeking to cloud Rodriguez's title due to a purported defective foreclosure.
- Rodriguez granted a mortgage to MERS as nominee for Finance America; the mortgage was recorded.
- On June 29, 2006, MERS had not assigned the mortgage to U.S. Bank, but on that date U.S. Bank executed a foreclosure deed purporting to transfer the property.
- MERS assigned the mortgage to U.S. Bank on July 21, 2006, and a confirmatory foreclosure deed was executed on October 9, 2006.
- U.S. Bank then quitclaimed the property to Bevilacqua on October 17, 2006; Bevilacqua claimed to reside on the property and hold record title.
- The Land Court dismissed Bevilacqua’s petition for lack of standing, and Bevilacqua appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Bevilacqua has standing to file a try title action | Bevilacqua asserts possession and record title via quitclaim deed and chain of title | Rodriguez/defendants contend no record title held by Bevilacqua | Bevilacqua lacks standing; record title not shown |
| Whether a single recorded quitclaim deed suffices to establish record title | Quitclaim deed alone should establish record title | Mere deed recording not enough without title in grantor's chain | Single deed insufficient; must show effective chain of title |
| Whether the foreclosure by U.S. Bank without proper assignment voids title and defeats Bevilacqua’s claim | Foreclosure deed could support Bevilacqua’s mortgage-related title | Foreclosure void if authority to foreclose lacking; title defective | Foreclosure void; chain defective prevents Bevilacqua from obtaining record title |
| Whether Bevilacqua can rely on being mortgagee or as bona fide purchaser to gain standing | Bevilacqua as mortgagee or bona fide purchaser for value should give standing | Equitable/mortgage theory inconsistent with relief sought; no notice of defects | Mortgagee/bona fide purchaser theory cannot supply standing here |
| Whether dismissal should be with prejudice or without prejudice | Dismissal should be with prejudice due to lack of standing | Dismissal should prevent further action on same issues | Dismissal should be without prejudice; could be pursued in different form |
Key Cases Cited
- Arnold v. Reed, 162 Mass. 438 (1894) (requirement of record title for try title actions; mere possession insufficient)
- Blanchard v. Lowell, 177 Mass. 501 (1901) (two-step structure of try title; need adverse claim and testing mechanism)
- U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Ibanez, 458 Mass. 637 (2011) (foreclosure lacking jurisdiction/authority void; title theory context)
- Mead v. Cutler, 208 Mass. 391 (1911) (writ of entry context; historical background to possessory actions)
