History
  • No items yet
midpage
Betancourt v. State
322 Ga. App. 201
Ga. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Betancourt and Hernandez were jointly tried and convicted of trafficking in cocaine; Hernandez alone was convicted of obstructing a law-enforcement officer.
  • A Gwinnett County officer stopped a Massachusetts-registered vehicle for window-tint and driving behavior; driver Betancourt had Rhode Island license and claimed the car belonged to a friend.
  • During the stop, delays occurred while verifying identities and licenses via computer checks; a translator arrived, and Betancourt consented to a search contingent on Hernandez’s consent.
  • Hernandez consented to the search; a hidden compartment under the rear seat revealed 5.085 kilograms of cocaine.
  • A separate North Carolina incident involving Betancourt and Hernandez yielded $195,000 in cash from hidden compartments, leading to-forfeiture; the State offered this as similar-transaction evidence.
  • The trial court admitted similar-transaction evidence and the court denied motions to suppress; both appellants challenged ineffective assistance claims.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the stop was unlawfully prolonged Betancourt Betancourt Detention reasonable; search consent obtained during stop.
Whether the search exceeded the scope of consent Hernandez Hernandez Consent to search was broad and scope not exceeded.
Admissibility of similar-transaction evidence Betancourt Betancourt Admissible under proper purpose, similarity, and relevance; outweighed exclusionary costs.
Effectiveness of counsel Betancourt Betancourt Counsel's performance not deficient; trial defense not prejudiced.

Key Cases Cited

  • Davis v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2419 (U.S. 2011) (deterrence and exclusionary rule balancing in cross-jurisdictional contexts)
  • Williams v. State, 261 Ga. 640 (Ga. 1991) (probative value of similar transactions and stop duration)
  • Crenshaw v. State, 248 Ga. App. 505 (Ga. App. 2001) (relevance and admissibility of prior acts in similar transactions)
  • Amato v. State, 193 Ga. App. 459 (Ga. App. 1989) (scope of consent and search techniques in vehicle searches)
  • Branch v. State, 255 Ga. App. 596 (Ga. App. 2002) (drug evidence admissibility and related issues)
  • McNaughton v. State, 290 Ga. 894 (Ga. 2012) (precedent on similar-transaction rules and intent evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Betancourt v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 12, 2013
Citation: 322 Ga. App. 201
Docket Number: A13A0289; A13A0290
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.