300 Ga. 489
Ga.2017Background
- On Feb. 13–14, 2012, Michael Berrien shot Marcus Collins from a car after Collins brought marijuana to a park; Collins died from three gunshot wounds.
- Evidence included Berrien’s jail call asking his father to hide the gun, the father leading police to a Hi-Point .380 matched by ballistics, and testimonies from Vanessa Marrero, Jacob Cornett, and Brandon Williams implicating Berrien.
- A Coffee County grand jury indicted Berrien for malice murder, felony murder (aggravated assault), and firearm offenses; trial began Sept. 2, 2014, with experienced counsel J. Clayton Culp representing Berrien.
- Before opening statements, Berrien entered an Alford guilty plea to felony murder; other charges were nolle prossed, and the court sentenced him to life with parole.
- Six days later Berrien moved to withdraw the plea, alleging ineffective assistance (poor investigation, misleading advice to plead to delay trial) and claiming a manifest injustice because he maintained someone else shot the victim; the trial court held an evidentiary hearing and denied the motion.
- The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed, finding no deficient performance or prejudice and that an Alford plea is permissible where the defendant won’t admit guilt if there is a factual basis.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ineffective assistance of counsel in plea decision | Berrien: Culp failed to investigate/prepare and misadvised him to plead to delay trial, promising he could withdraw a week later | State/Culp: Culp investigated, concluded evidence was overwhelming, denied advising plea for delay or promising withdrawal | Denied: Credibility findings favored Culp; Berrien failed to show deficient performance or that he would have gone to trial but for counsel’s conduct |
| Motion to withdraw plea to correct manifest injustice | Berrien: Continued protestations of innocence and claim someone else shot the victim justify withdrawal | State: An Alford plea is valid where defendant won’t admit guilt if factual basis exists; plea was knowing and voluntary | Denied: Alford governs; unwillingness to admit participation is not a manifest injustice when plea is knowing, voluntary, and supported by facts |
Key Cases Cited
- North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970) (a defendant may plead guilty while maintaining innocence if plea is voluntary and supported by a factual basis)
- Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012) (prejudice standard for ineffective assistance in plea context)
- Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985) (standard for ineffective assistance claims affecting guilty pleas)
- Glover v. State, 300 Ga. 88 (2016) (credibility determinations at plea-withdrawal hearings lie with trial court)
- McGuyton v. State, 298 Ga. 351 (2016) (denial of motion to withdraw Alford plea not abuse where plea knowing and factual basis exists)
- McKiernan v. State, 288 Ga. 140 (2010) (upholding denial of motion to withdraw Alford plea to felony murder)
- Fairclough v. State, 276 Ga. 602 (2003) (granting out-of-time appeal is functionally equivalent to entry of judgment)
- Miller v. State, 273 Ga. 831 (2001) (premature notice of appeal may ripen with later order)
- Gillen v. Bostick, 234 Ga. 308 (1975) (notice of appeal filed before judgment can vest jurisdiction if effective)
