Bernals, Inc. v. Kessler-Greystone, LLC
70 So. 3d 315
Ala.2011Background
- Bernals, Inc. leased Greystone Park (suites 113-114) to Bernals under a 2005 lease; Maria E. Adan signed as sole owner and guaranteed rent.
- Brentwood Properties managed Greystone Park and had authority to enforce leases and collect rents under an agency agreement with Taylor, later terminated.
- Brentwood sued Bernals and Adan in 2008 for lease breaches; Brentwood was not a signatory to the lease and later assigned the case to Kessler-Greystone, LLC.
- Trial court initially denied Brentwood’s standing challenge; Brentwood was substituted by Kessler in 2008; Adan and Bernals asserted various counterclaims.
- A May 1, 2009 default judgment was entered against Adan for $84,271.24; Bernals later obtained a separate summary judgment for $130,029.44 against Adan and Bernals on related counts.
- On appeal, the court held Brentwood lacked standing to sue and that, without standing, subject-matter jurisdiction was void; judgments were vacated and the case dismissed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Brentwood had standing to sue | Brentwood had a contractual right to enforce leases as manager. | Brentwood was not a party to the lease and had no standing. | Brentwood lacked standing; jurisdiction failed. |
| Whether Brentwood was a third-party beneficiary of the lease | Lease intended to benefit Brentwood as manager; thus Brentwood could sue. | Lease failed to show Brentwood as a direct intended beneficiary; no standing. | No third-party beneficiary under the lease. |
| Whether substitution of Kessler cured lack of standing | Kessler substituted for Brentwood to preserve the action. | Substitution cannot cure lack of subject-matter jurisdiction when original plaintiff lacked standing. | Substitution did not cure jurisdictional defect; action remains void. |
| Effect of lack of standing on judgments and appeal | Judgments should not be vacated due to potential meritorious claims. | Without jurisdiction, judgments are void and appeals must be dismissed. | Judgments void; case and appeal dismissed. |
Key Cases Cited
- Cadle Co. v. Shabani, 4 So.3d 460 (Ala. 2008) (standing cannot be cured by adding a party lacking jurisdiction)
- 2018 Rainbow Drive, 740 So.2d 1027 (Ala. 1999) (standing requires injury in fact to a legally protected right)
- Ex parte Steadman, 812 So.2d 290 (Ala. 2001) (test for third-party beneficiary requires intended direct benefit)
- Redtop Market, Inc. v. State, 66 So.3d 204 (Ala. 2010) (void judgments when subject-matter jurisdiction is lacking)
- Lauterbach v. Gordon, 56 So.3d 613 (Ala. 2010) (motion to set aside default judgment deemed denied after 90 days; timeliness of appeal)
- Dunning v. New England Life Ins. Co., 890 So.2d 92 (Ala. 2003) (one not a party to a contract cannot sue for its breach)
