History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berlin v. State
2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16274
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Aaron Berlin appeals judgments and sentences for two counts of sexual battery on a person under twelve and one count of lewd or lascivious molestation.
  • State concedes error that the convictions violate double jeopardy.
  • All three offenses arose from a single criminal episode.
  • First sexual battery count was vaginal penetration; second sexual battery count was anal penetration by Berlin's penis.
  • Leud or lascivious molestation had no separate act; it stemmed from the same episode as the two sexual battery acts.
  • Trial court imposed concurrent life sentences; Berlin moved to correct illegal sentence, which the court denied; on appeal the conviction for lewd molestation was vacated.
  • Court reverses only the lewd/molestation conviction; affirms the two sexual battery convictions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does double jeopardy require reversal? Berlin State Yes; lewd/molestation conviction reversed

Key Cases Cited

  • Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932) (two offenses must be distinct under Blockburger)
  • Smith v. State, 41 So.3d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (same act can support multiple sexual battery convictions)
  • Meshell, 2 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2009) (two offenses from single touching episode)
  • State v. Paul, 934 So.2d 1167 (Fla.2006) (de novo review of double jeopardy issue)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Berlin v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 17, 2011
Citation: 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16274
Docket Number: 1D10-3924
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.