Benton v. State
300 Ga. 202
Ga.2016Background
- Shortly after midnight on Sept. 3, 2009, Jasmine Lynn was fatally shot and Jarvis Jones was wounded during a melee near Clark Atlanta University; six 9mm casings were found on Mitchell Street.
- Benton was seen earlier that night wearing a red hooded shirt, reddish Mohawk, and carrying a distinctive tan-and-red "Gucci" book bag; his fingerprints were later found on the bag and an item inside it, and he admitted the bag was his and that he left it at the scene.
- Witnesses testified the shooter ran down Mitchell Street (where shots were fired) carrying a book bag; Brandon Hall identified Benton at trial as the shooter; Benton admitted lying to police and changing his hair after the shooting.
- Benton testified he was present but that his friend Clarence Carter (who wore dreadlocks) fired the shots; Benton and others had previously coordinated a false account to investigators.
- Jury convicted Benton of felony murder (life), aggravated assault (concurrent 25 years), and possession of a firearm during a felony (consecutive 5 years); malice murder charge was acquitted and gang charge nolle prosequi.
- Post-trial, Benton raised (1) a public-trial claim based on limited courthouse access on a Saturday and (2) ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to interview/call witness Darius Brooks; both claims were rejected and judgments affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Courthouse closure / public-trial right | Benton: denying family access to Saturday proceedings infringed his Sixth/Fourteenth rights | State/Court: procedures announced; Benton failed to object at trial | Waived for appeal; no relief (no contemporaneous objection) |
| Ineffective assistance — failure to interview/call Brooks | Benton: counsel's failure was deficient and prejudiced outcome by undermining ID evidence | State: counsel's actions were reasonable; Brooks's testimony would not have created reasonable probability of different outcome | Denied — failed Strickland prejudice prong |
| Sufficiency of evidence | Benton did not contest on appeal | N/A | Court independently reviewed and found evidence sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia |
| Identification reliability | Benton: witness Brooks would have shown Hall couldn't ID shooter initially and others misidentified hair; would impeach Hall/Hall's ID | State: Brooks's statements did not contradict that the shooter ran down Mitchell with a book bag; multiple witnesses linked book bag and shooter to Benton | Court: Brooks's testimony would not have reasonably changed the verdict; physical evidence (fingerprints on bag) and multiple eyewitnesses supported ID |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (standard for sufficiency of evidence review)
- Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (failure to timely assert a constitutional right can forfeit it)
- Spickler v. State, 276 Ga. 164 (contemporaneous objection required to preserve trial error)
- Reid v. State, 286 Ga. 484 (public-trial claim must be objected to at trial)
- Henderson v. State, 207 Ga. 206 (public access and trial procedures)
- State v. Abernathy, 289 Ga. 603 (unchallenged courtroom closure claims may be raised only via ineffective assistance claim)
- Smith v. Francis, 253 Ga. 782 (Strickland framework applied in Georgia)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (ineffective assistance — performance and prejudice prongs)
- Redding v. State, 297 Ga. 845 (deference to counsel tactical decisions unless patently unreasonable)
- Robinson v. State, 277 Ga. 75 (appellate review accepts trial court factual findings; legal conclusions reviewed de novo)
- Sanders v. State, 290 Ga. 637 (no Strickland prejudice where new witness would not likely change outcome)
- Allen v. State, 286 Ga. 392 (same)
