midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
163 Conn.App. 750
Conn. App. Ct.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Patrick Bennett purchased 112–114 Bennett Street, Bridgeport, in 1963 and title was later transferred to plaintiff in 2006.
  • Defendants, adjacent owners at 2926–2930 Fairfield Avenue, held fee simple title to parcels one and two and an easement across plaintiff’s land.
  • Parcels one and two are a rear rectangular parcel and a front triangular parcel, with an eight‑foot passway across plaintiff’s property serving the defendants’ property.
  • A chain‑link/razor‑wire fence and other barriers historically prevented access to the easement; plaintiff and his family maintained the three areas since 1963
  • Plaintiff filed suit on August 23, 2011 seeking quiet title under §47‑31 and acquisition by adverse possession under §52‑575; trial court found in plaintiff’s favor on all three areas and vesting in Patrick Bennett in 1978 based on long possession.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether plaintiff proved adverse possession of parcels one and two Bennett showed open, notorious, hostile, continuous, exclusive use since 1963 Defendants contend lack of consent and insufficient proof Yes; possession was without consent and sustained by clear and convincing evidence.
Whether the defendants’ easement was extinguished by prescription Use of the easement by the servient owner ceased access through the parcels for 15+ years Easement could remain despite cessation of use Yes; easement extinguished by prescriptive use.

Key Cases Cited

  • Woodhouse v. McKee, 90 Conn. App. 662 (2005) (hostility means absence of consent in adverse possession)
  • Mulle v. McCauley, 102 Conn. App. 803 (2007) (clear and convincing standard; hostile possession requires absence of consent)
  • Skelly v. Brucher, 134 Conn. App. 337 (2012) (adverse possession standard and scope of review)
  • Mierzejewski v. Brownell, 102 Conn. App. 413 (2007) (extinguishment of easement by prescription; factual review)
  • Russo v. Terek, 7 Conn. App. 252 (1986) (extinguishment by adverse use; right to use vacant land)
  • Public Storage, Inc. v. Eliot Street Ltd. Partnership, 20 Conn. App 380 (1989) (chain‑link fence effect on prescriptive period)
  • Roche v. Fairfield, 186 Conn. 490 (1982) (exclusive possession standard for adverse possession)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bennett v. Bowditch
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 2016
Citations: 163 Conn.App. 750; 137 A.3d 81; AC37243
Docket Number: AC37243
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In