Benjamin Brian Arvin v. Carolyn W Colvin
2:12-cv-08203
C.D. Cal.Jun 10, 2013Background
- Arvin applied for SSI on August 19, 2009, alleging disability beginning January 1, 2009.
- SSA denied benefits initially (October 19, 2009) and on reconsideration (December 4, 2009).
- An ALJ, Sally Reason, held a hearing and issued a decision on April 14, 2011 finding Arvin not disabled.
- Plaintiff sought Appeals Council review, which was denied, prompting this judicial review action.
- The court reverses and remands the Commissioner’s decision for further proceedings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the ALJ properly evaluated listing impairments | Arvin was not properly considered under 12.04/12.09, especially paragraph C. | ALJ adequately assessed criteria and weight of opinions under listings. | Remand for proper listing analysis and weight attribution. |
| Whether the ALJ gave clear and convincing reasons to reject pain testimony | ALJ failed to credibly reject subjective pain testimony given substantial evidence. | ALJ provided substantial evidence supporting rejection of credibility. | Remand for proper credibility analysis. |
Key Cases Cited
- Batson v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 359 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2004) (treating-source weight and need for legitimate reasons)
- Murray v. Heckler, 722 F.2d 499 (9th Cir. 1983) (necessity of specific, legitimate reasons to disregard treating opinions)
- Rollins v. Massanari, 261 F.3d 853 (9th Cir. 2001) (consequences of vague and conclusory reasons in disability decisions)
- Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273 (9th Cir. 1996) (need for clear and convincing reasons to discount credibility)
- Holohan v. Massanari, 246 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 2001) (requirements for explaining rejected testimony)
