History
  • No items yet
midpage
80 A.3d 476
Pa. Super. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Decedent Lynn Sewak received cervical neck manipulations from chiropractors Brad Todaro and Joseph Willis for neck pain, headaches, and dizziness.
  • The day after her last chiropractic visit, Sewak suffered a vertebral artery dissection and massive stroke, rendering her "locked-in." She died about 18 months later from infection.
  • Plaintiff (administratrix Lillian M. Bell) sued for chiropractic malpractice, alleging the manipulations caused the dissection/stroke and also asserted lack of informed consent claims.
  • Trial court granted defendants’ motions in limine excluding the lack-of-informed-consent claims and rejected plaintiff’s attempt to plead a Survival Act cause of action late in the case.
  • After a nine-day jury trial, the jury returned a defense verdict. Post-trial motions were denied and plaintiff appealed those two procedural rulings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether informed-consent claim against chiropractors was wrongly dismissed Chiropractors should owe an informed-consent duty for manipulations; court should follow states like Wisconsin Pennsylvania precedent limits informed-consent to surgical/operative procedures; chiropractors perform non-surgical care Court affirmed dismissal: informed consent does not extend to non-surgical chiropractic procedures under PA law
Whether plaintiff should have been allowed to amend complaint to add a Survival Act claim Estate should be permitted to add survival claim after decedent's death Amendment was untimely because survival claim accrued at death and statute of limitations had expired Court affirmed denial: amendment filed well after two-year limitations period, so amendment properly refused

Key Cases Cited

  • Matukonis v. Trainer, 657 A.2d 1314 (Pa. Super. 1995) (refuses informed-consent claims against chiropractors for non-surgical manipulations)
  • Morgan v. MacPhail, 704 A.2d 617 (Pa. 1997) (supreme court reaffirming informed-consent limited to surgical/operative procedures)
  • Pastierik v. Duquesne Light Co., 526 A.2d 323 (Pa. 1987) (survival action accrual occurs, at the latest, at decedent's death)
  • Holt v. Lenko, 791 A.2d 1212 (Pa. Super. 2002) (survival action may be brought by administrator to recover losses to the estate)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bell v. Willis
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 8, 2013
Citations: 80 A.3d 476; 2013 WL 5962874; 2013 Pa. Super. 293; 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3155
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
Log In
    Bell v. Willis, 80 A.3d 476