History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bell v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
626 Pa. 270
| Pa. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Bell was convicted in 2012 of DUI under 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(c), homicide by vehicle while DUI (75 Pa.C.S. § 3735), and homicide by vehicle (75 Pa.C.S. § 3732) after a fatal crash.
  • PennDOT suspended Bell’s operating privilege: 1 year for DUI, 3 years for homicide by vehicle while DUI, and 3 years for homicide by vehicle.
  • Bell appealed, and the trial court merged the homicide by vehicle and homicide by vehicle while DUI convictions for operating-privilege purposes, imposing a single 3-year suspension.
  • Commonwealth Court initially held that the convictions merge for operating-privilege suspensions, aligning civil consequences with criminal sentencing doctrine.
  • The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the plain language of §1532(a) and §1532(a.l) requires separate suspensions for each listed offense, and that the merger doctrine does not apply to civil driver-licensing penalties.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Do homicide by vehicle and homicide by vehicle while DUI merge for license suspensions? Bell argued they merge due to single-episode facts; merger mirrors sentencing. PennDOT argued no merge; §1532(a) and §1532(a.l) mandate separate suspensions per offense. No; separate suspensions required for each listed offense.
Should the criminal merger doctrine apply to civil operating-privilege suspensions? Bell and source cases support merger to reflect underlying convictions. PennDOT contends merger doctrine is not applicable in civil penalties and statute omits merger language. Merger doctrine does not apply to civil license suspensions.
Is Commonwealth v. Collins controlling in this civil context? Collins governs criminal sentencing; may not control civil suspensions. PennDOT relies on Collins to argue for non-merger in sentencing; urges similar logic in civil context. Collins controls criminal sentencing and is distinguishable; civil suspensions are not governed by Collins.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Collins, 564 Pa. 144, 764 A.2d 1056 (Pa. 2001) (criminal sentences do not merge for homicide by vehicle and homicide by vehicle while DUI)
  • Freundt v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 584 Pa. 283, 883 A.2d 503 (Pa. 2005) (single criminal episode analysis for § 1532(c) suspensions)
  • Drabic v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 588 Pa. 670, 906 A.2d 1153 (Pa. 2006) ( merger of collateral civil consequences with underlying convictions discussed)
  • Strawn v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 609 Pa. 482, 17 A.3d 320 (Pa. 2011) (single criminal episode analysis limited to § 1532(c); moving violations § 1532(b) treated differently)
  • Zimmerman v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 759 A.2d 953 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2000) (earlier stance on merger in civil penalties (perspective discussed))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bell v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 21, 2014
Citation: 626 Pa. 270
Court Abbreviation: Pa.