History
  • No items yet
midpage
BELINDA DODSON VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC Â EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
A-2336-15T2
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | Jun 23, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Belinda Dodson, a juvenile detention officer, alleged a May 24, 2010 fight at work caused a permanent disabling back injury; she previously had a 2003 back injury from a work fight.
  • Dodson applied for accidental disability retirement under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-43; the Board initially awarded ordinary disability benefits but denied accidental disability benefits.
  • The Board obtained independent evaluations: Dr. Weiss (initial IME) found permanent disability from degenerative condition; Dr. Berman (subsequent IME) found no permanent injury.
  • At OAL hearing, Dodson presented Dr. Fass (testifying for her) who relied on a 2010 discogram showing annular tear; the Board’s Dr. Berman relied on a 2010 MRI showing chronic degenerative changes and no new herniation.
  • The ALJ credited Dr. Berman over Dr. Fass, found Dodson failed to prove total and permanent disability as a direct result of the 2010 traumatic event, and the Board adopted the ALJ’s decision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Dodson proved she is permanently and totally disabled Dodson: 2010 incident substantially aggravated her 2003 injury and caused permanent disability Board: medical evidence (MRI/ exam) shows no new or permanent injury; disability not proven Held: Dodson failed to prove total and permanent disability; benefit denied
Proper causation standard under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-43 Dodson: only must show 2010 incident was a "substantial contributing cause" of disability Board: claimant still must prove total and permanent disability; proximate-cause inquiry unnecessary if disability not shown Held: Court applied established law (Gerba); because disability not shown, causation analysis unnecessary
Weight to be given conflicting expert opinions and diagnostic tests Dodson: discogram evidence and Dr. Fass support traumatic aggravation Board: MRI, objective exam, and Dr. Berman more reliable; discogram medically controversial Held: ALJ permissibly credited Dr. Berman and MRI over discogram and symptom-based findings
Standard of review for Board's factual findings Dodson: Board erred in applying pre-existing condition bar Board: ALJ credibility findings entitled to deference; Board decision supported by record Held: Appellate review limited; Board s decision not arbitrary or capricious and is affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Gerba v. Bd. of Trs. of the Pub. Emps.' Ret. Sys., 83 N.J. 174 (establishes requirement that traumatic event be substantial contributing cause for accidental disability)
  • Richardson v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys., 192 N.J. 189 (five-part test for accidental disability; first prong requires total and permanent disability)
  • In re Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19 (standard for appellate review of administrative decisions)
  • Russo v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys., 206 N.J. 14 (deference and review standards for pension board decisions)
  • State v. Townsend, 186 N.J. 473 (assessment of weight and significance of expert testimony)
  • Clowes v. Terminix Int'l, Inc., 109 N.J. 575 (hearsay from non-testifying doctors is admissible but limits evidentiary weight)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: BELINDA DODSON VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC Â EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Jun 23, 2017
Docket Number: A-2336-15T2
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.