History
  • No items yet
midpage
Beary v. Larry Murphy Dump Truck Serv., Inc.
2011 Ohio 4977
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Beary, an employee of Larry Murphy Dump Truck Service, Inc. (LMDT), was injured when a skid steer operated by Road Aggregates, owned by the same owner, backed up toward him while he and a coworker were placing caution tape around a paving area.
  • The skid steer was owned by LMDT and did not have a working backup alarm due to corroded/disconnected wiring.
  • Beary sued LMDT for an intentional tort under R.C. 2745.01 and Road Aggregates for negligence, alleging injury from the machine’s operation.
  • Road Aggregates argued Blackburn, the operator, was a loaned servant and that it had no control over the job site or equipment.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment to both defendants; the appellate court reviews de novo whether there are genuine issues of material fact.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is there a genuine issue of material fact on whether LMDT committed an intentional tort? Beary contends backup alarm failure shows deliberate intent or substantial certainty of injury. LMDT argues alarm failure does not fit an equipment safety guard and no deliberate removal is proven. No; alarm not an equipment safety guard, and no deliberate removal shown; summary judgment for LMDT affirmed.
Is Road Aggregates liable under the loaned servant doctrine for Blackburn’s negligence? Blackburn’s negligence is attributable to Road Aggregates due to control of the project. Blackburn was a loaned servant to LMDT; Road Aggregates is immune for negligence. Yes; Blackburn was loaned to LMDT and Road Aggregates entitled to immunity; summary judgment affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Houndshell v. American States Insurance Company, 67 Ohio St.2d 427 (1981) (summary-judgment standard; material facts)
  • Inland Refuse Transfer Company v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc., 15 Ohio St.3d 321 (1984) (material fact requirement for summary judgment)
  • Smiddy v. The Wedding Party, Inc., 30 Ohio St.3d 35 (1987) (de novo review of summary judgment standard)
  • Drescher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (1996) (burden-shifting in summary-judgment context)
  • Dirksing v. Blue Chip Architectural Products, Inc., 100 Ohio App.3d 213 (1994) (loaned servant doctrine framework)
  • Medina v. Harold J. Becker Company, Inc., 2005-Ohio-5438 (2005) (loaned-employee immunity analysis)
  • Fickle v. Conversion Technologies International, Inc., 2011-Ohio-2960 (2011) (equipment-safety-guard definitions; plain-meaning approach)
  • Beary v. Larry Murphy Dump Truck Service, Inc., 2011-Ohio-4977 (2011) (appellate affirmation of summary judgments)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Beary v. Larry Murphy Dump Truck Serv., Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 26, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 4977
Docket Number: 2011-CA-00048
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.