History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bean v. Fike (INMATE 1)
2:25-cv-00262
M.D. Ala.
Apr 14, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Euphrates Earl Bean, an Alabama-based pro se plaintiff, filed a § 1983 civil rights action regarding his 2016 arrest by Officer Theodore Fike of the Montgomery Police Department.
  • Plaintiff alleged excessive force, racial discrimination, and was denied the right to engage in commercial activities after his semi-truck was blocked and he was arrested.
  • The arrest and related injuries occurred on September 8, 2016; criminal charges were eventually dismissed with prejudice in July 2017.
  • Plaintiff filed the lawsuit on February 8, 2025—over eight years after the incident and more than five years after seeking medical treatment in 2019.
  • Bean argued that the statute of limitations might be tolled by his "judicial circumstances," but provided no allegations suggesting legal disabilities such as age or insanity.
  • The court screened the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for timeliness and frivolity.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether claims are time-barred by statutes Bean asserted possible tolling due to prison Statute of limitations expired; no valid tolling Claims are time-barred; lawsuit dismissed
Statute of limitations for § 1983 and related Claims accrued later, possibly at treatment Claims accrued in 2016, the date of the action Federal law: claims accrued in 2016, limitations expired
Applicability of tolling for imprisonment Imprisonment tolled limitations Alabama law: imprisonment not a basis for tolling Statute is not tolled by imprisonment
Viability of amendment to the complaint Implied request to amend or toll Any amendment would be futile No amendment allowed; claims futile if amended

Key Cases Cited

  • Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (pro se complaints are held to a less stringent standard)
  • Hughes v. Lott, 350 F.3d 1157 (district court may dismiss § 1983 claims as frivolous if time-barred)
  • La Grasta v. First Union Sec., Inc., 358 F.3d 840 (dismissal on statute of limitations grounds is appropriate if time bar is apparent)
  • Chapman v. Dunn, 129 F.4th 1307 (statute of limitations for § 1983 claims governed by state personal injury limits; federal law on accrual)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bean v. Fike (INMATE 1)
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Date Published: Apr 14, 2025
Docket Number: 2:25-cv-00262
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Ala.