History
  • No items yet
midpage
397 S.W.3d 54
Mo. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Irene Lambur executed a durable power of attorney naming Anna Stidham and Jackie Johnson as her attorneys in fact in 2005.
  • Anna and Jackie opened two joint survivorship bank accounts with Irene’s funds after transferring Irene’s money from her prior accounts.
  • Irene died intestate in May 2005 with the two accounts totaling about $129,134.46.
  • Joyce Baxter, as Irene’s estate personal representative, filed a discovery-of-assets petition seeking title/possession to the two accounts’ proceeds.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment against Anna and Matt; this court later reversed/ remanded as to Matt, and affirmed as to Anna.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Anna was entitled to possession of the proceeds as a matter of law Stidham Baxter/estate argued Anna could not lawfully take beyond $11,000 Anna not entitled; gift to herself exceeded authority; summary judgment in favor of respondents as to Anna affirmed
Whether Irene’s involvement/signature created a genuine issue of fact Stidham Estate contends Irene participated in opening accounts No genuine issue; Irene was not present; accounts were gifts to Anna under PoA
Whether Matt benefited from or possessed the funds, creating a triable issue Stidham Respondents argue Matt benefited/possessed Genuine issue of material fact exists; summary judgment reversed as to Matt and remanded
Whether the Lambur PoA authorized gifts to the attorney-in-fact beyond the annual exclusion Stidham Estate argues PoA allowed gifts PoA expressly authorized only inter vivos gifts up to $11,000 per year; Anna exceeded authority

Key Cases Cited

  • Bridges v. White, 223 S.W.3d 195 (Mo.App. S.D.2007) (deposit of decedent’s proceeds into joint account with right of survivorship constitutes a gift to attorney-in-fact; strict construction of PoA required)
  • Herbert v. Mercantile Trust Co., 152 S.W.3d 353 (Mo. 2005) (written authorization required for attorney-in-fact to gift principal’s property to self; public policy to restrict self-dealing)
  • Arambula v. Atwell, 948 S.W.2d 173 (Mo.App.S.D.1997) (strict construction of PoA; need written authorization for gifts by attorney-in-fact)
  • In re Estate of Lambur, 317 S.W.3d 616 (Mo.App.S.D.2010) (prior appeal establishing procedural context for discovery-of-assets case)
  • Mercantile Trust Co. v. Harper, 622 S.W.2d 345 (Mo.App.E.D.1981) (PoA to be strictly construed; fiduciary duties prevent unauthorized gifts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Baxter v. Stidham
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 23, 2013
Citations: 397 S.W.3d 54; 2013 WL 1748335; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 491; No. SD 31910
Docket Number: No. SD 31910
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In
    Baxter v. Stidham, 397 S.W.3d 54