History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barrows v. American Family Insurance
842 N.W.2d 508
Wis. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • A.B. was 11, lived with LaValla and Renfrow in Osceola, WI.
  • On Oct 18, 2011, A.B. found an unsecured loaded handgun and shot himself; death classified as suicide.
  • Barrows sued Renfrow, LaValla, and American Family for wrongful death based on Renfrow's alleged negligent storage.
  • American Family moved for summary judgment arguing intra-insured and intentional injury exclusions barred coverage; circuit court granted.
  • This appeal addresses whether the intra-insured exclusion bars Barrows’ wrongful death claim, and whether the policy provides an initial grant of coverage.
  • The court adopts the majority rule that intra-insured exclusions bar coverage for wrongful death claims arising from an insured’s death, even when the claimant is a non-insured.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does the intra-insured exclusion bar Barrows’ wrongful death claim? Barrows argues exclusion does not cover a non-insured’s wrongful death. American Family contends exclusion precludes any claim arising from an insured’s bodily injury. Yes, exclusion bars the claim.
Does the exclusion apply to loss of services resulting from an insured’s death? Barrows contends loss of services is not a bodily injury to an insured. American Family argues bodily injury to an insured includes loss of services from insured’s death. Yes, exclusion covers loss of services arising from insured’s bodily injury.

Key Cases Cited

  • Cincinnati Indemnity Co. v. Martin, 710 N.E.2d 677 (Ohio 1999) (intra-insured exclusion excludes father’s wrongful death claim)
  • Wintlend v. Baertschi, 963 S.W.2d 387 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998) (intra-insured exclusion bars relatives’ wrongful death claims)
  • Moore, American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Moore, 970 S.W.2d 876 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998) (intra-insured exclusion excludes claims derived from insured’s harm)
  • Day v. Allstate Indem. Co., 2011 WI 24 (Wis. 2011) (focus on whether any benefit would accrue to insured; not dispositive here)
  • Walker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 850 So.2d 882 (La. Ct. App. 2003) (minority rule; wrongful death not covered under umbrella policy exclusions)
  • Ruppa v. American States Ins. Co., 91 Wis.2d 628 (Wis. 1979) (wrongful death statute context; injury to insured analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Barrows v. American Family Insurance
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Date Published: Dec 10, 2013
Citation: 842 N.W.2d 508
Docket Number: No. 2013AP720
Court Abbreviation: Wis. Ct. App.