History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barnes v. State
364 S.W.3d 765
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Movant Barnes appeals the motion court's denial of his amended Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing.
  • On January 22, 2009, Barnes pled guilty to assault in the second degree, unlawful weapon use, and felony resisting arrest; total five-year sentence suspended on probation for five years.
  • Probation violated on December 3, 2009; sentence executed; Barnes delivered to DOC on December 9, 2009.
  • Barnes filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion on July 28, 2010; amended motion filed October 2, 2010 alleging attorney coercion.
  • Motion court denied relief, holding movant failed to show ineffective assistance; court did not hold an evidentiary hearing.
  • Court holds the motion untimely; 180-day filing window runs from December 9, 2009, to June 7, 2010, requiring dismissal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of Rule 24.035 motion. Barnes contends timely filing and coercion facts merit relief. State asserts untimely filing and waiver of rights under Rule 24.035. Motion is untimely; must be dismissed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bond v. State, 326 S.W.3d 828 (Mo. App. E.D. 2010) (timeliness measured from custody delivery and 180-day window)
  • Gehrke v. State, 280 S.W.3d 54 (Mo. Banc. 2009) (mandatory dismissal for untimely Rule 24.035 motion)
  • Swofford v. State, 323 S.W.3d 60 (Mo. App. E.D. 2010) (state can address movant’s untimeliness sua sponte)
  • Dorris v. State, 360 S.W.3d 260 (Mo. Banc. 2012) (movant must show timely filing and merits for an evidentiary hearing)
  • Mackley v. State, 331 S.W.3d 733 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011) (untimely post-conviction motion results in waiver)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Barnes v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 17, 2012
Citation: 364 S.W.3d 765
Docket Number: ED 97070
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.