History
  • No items yet
midpage
Banks v. Kondaur Capital Corp. (In Re Banks)
457 B.R. 9
8th Cir. BAP
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtors Edward and Diane Banks purchased a home in 2006 with a note and mortgage to New Century Mortgage Corp. (NCMC).
  • NCMC filed a Chapter 11 in 2007; related assets were reorganized under New Century TRS Holdings, Inc.
  • Ellington Management Group purchased many assets, including the Bankses' note and mortgage, via an Asset Purchase Agreement approved in 2007.
  • Ellington, as attorney-in-fact for New Century, later assigned the mortgage to Elizon LA 2007-2, LLC; the assignment was recorded in 2009, but Kondaur contends it was a mistake.
  • A supposedly corrective assignment in 2010 purported to re-assign the mortgage to Kondaur and was recorded in 2010.
  • Banks filed Chapter 13 in 2010 and subsequently sued Kondaur to challenge its standing and the mortgage lien; Kondaur moved to dismiss, treated as summary judgment, which the bankruptcy court granted.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Kondaur has possession and standing to enforce the note. Banks contend the note is not endorsed to Kondaur and is not in Kondaur's possession; evidence of the Corrective Assignment is insufficient to prove standing. Kondaur maintains it possesses the note and is the proper holder; the note is endorsed in blank and thus bearer paper; the assignments support Kondaur's rights. Summary judgment improper; material fact dispute over possession/endorsement remains.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Waterman, 248 B.R. 567 (8th Cir. BAP 2000) (standards for review and summary judgment guidance)
  • Horras, 443 B.R. 159 (8th Cir. BAP 2011) (de novo review of legal conclusions; summary judgment standards)
  • Patch, 526 F.3d 1176 (8th Cir. 2008) (clear error deference to findings; summary judgment considerations)
  • Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 644 F.3d 728 (8th Cir. 2011) (guidance on substantial facts and inferences for summary judgment)
  • Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., 770 N.W.2d 487 (Minn. 2009) (note possession and foreclosure considerations in Minnesota context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Banks v. Kondaur Capital Corp. (In Re Banks)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 11, 2011
Citation: 457 B.R. 9
Docket Number: BAP 11-6025
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir. BAP