History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bank of America, National Ass'n v. Asbury
2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7959
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Brooke Asbury owned residential property secured by a promissory note and mortgage; she defaulted and Bank of America accelerated the note and filed a foreclosure complaint on July 29, 2009.
  • Bank of America’s complaint alleged generally that "all conditions precedent" to foreclosure had been performed; Asbury answered with general denials and answered "without knowledge" as to that allegation.
  • At nonjury trial, Bank of America offered testimony and a proffered default letter to prove it mailed the required pre-foreclosure default notice (Paragraph 22 of the mortgage); the trial court found the bank did not prove mailing and entered final judgment for Asbury.
  • The trial court ruled the bank "failed to introduce any evidence" that conditions precedent were met and that the default letter was mailed; Bank of America appealed.
  • The appellate majority held the dispositive issue was pleading: Asbury never specifically pleaded noncompliance with the condition precedent (mailing), so she waived that defense and the trial court erred in entering judgment on that basis.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Bank of America) Defendant's Argument (Asbury) Held
Whether defendant waived a challenge to plaintiff’s compliance with conditions precedent by failing to plead it specifically Bank argued Asbury did not specifically plead noncompliance so she waived that defense and could not prevail at trial on that ground Asbury argued she generally denied mailing ("without knowledge") and thus was not required to plead the specific condition because mailing was the only condition precedent Held: Defendant waived the defense by not pleading a specific denial of the condition precedent; trial court erred in entering judgment for Asbury on that basis
Whether the trial court properly refused to admit or credit bank’s proof of mailing Bank argued trial evidence (witness testimony and business records/bar code) established mailing; objected on appeal to exclusion/weight Asbury challenged witness competence and attacked proof at trial; trial court judged evidence insufficient and excluded parts as hearsay Held: Appellate court did not decide admissibility merits because waiver of pleading was dispositive; reversed and remanded for further proceedings
Whether an exception exists to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.120(c) when only a single condition precedent exists Bank argued rule applies normally and defendant must specifically deny; no exception Asbury argued no need to plead specifically when only one condition precedent (mailing) exists and she generally denied it Held: No exception — rule 1.120(c) requires specific denial regardless of single or multiple conditions
Whether issue was tried by consent or otherwise preserved despite pleading defects Bank argued pleading defect waived the issue Asbury could have argued the issue was tried by consent given trial evidence, but did not make that argument below Held: Appellate court noted the potential for a tried-by-consent argument but Asbury did not raise it; decision rests on pleading waiver

Key Cases Cited

  • Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack, 159 So.2d 236 (Fla. 1963) (pleadings define and narrow issues for trial)
  • Cooke v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 652 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (defendant must specifically plead denial of conditions precedent or waives right to demand proof)
  • VonDrasek v. City of St. Petersburg, 777 So.2d 989 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (failure to specifically plead condition precedent defense waives it)
  • Griffin v. Am. Gen. Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 752 So.2d 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (satisfaction of condition precedent must be specifically denied or is waived)
  • Barco v. Sch. Bd. of Pinellas Cnty., 975 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 2008) (rules of civil procedure are construed according to statutory-construction principles)
  • Aills v. Boemi, 29 So.3d 1105 (Fla. 2010) (appellate preservation requires raising specific legal grounds in trial court)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bank of America, National Ass'n v. Asbury
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 27, 2015
Citation: 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7959
Docket Number: 2D14-1965
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.