422 S.W.3d 515
Mo. Ct. App.2014Background
- In April 1998 NationsBank, N.A. loaned money to Ronald Duff d/b/a Ron Duff Video Productions with Jo Duff signing a guaranty and Ronald Duff signing related security agreements, all of which are enforceable by NationsBank and its successors.
- In February 2003 Bank of America, N.A. made a separate loan to Ronald and Jo Duff, evidenced by a promissory note; the 2003 note and 1998 documents require payment of attorneys’ fees the lender incurs enforcing rights.
- Bank of America filed suit for breach of the 1998 documents and the 2003 note, claiming ownership and holder status of the loan documents.
- Defendants answered denying knowledge to the ownership claim and did not challenge Plaintiff’s authority to sue regarding the 1998 documents.
- The trial court granted summary judgment to Plaintiff, concluding it was successor to NationsBank, and awarded legal fees; Defendants moved for new trial but the court did not rule on that motion.
- On appeal, the court held Defendants preserved some arguments but waived others, and ultimately affirmed the judgment awarding Plaintiff fees and enforcement rights.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Plaintiff was entitled to enforce the 1998 loan documents | Plaintiff was successor to NationsBank and entitled to enforce the documents | Plaintiff lacked holder status and authority to sue | Plaintiff entitled to enforce as successor |
| Whether Defendants preserved all appellate arguments on the 1998 documents and capacity to sue | Defendants preserved enough via timely new-trial motion | Some arguments were not preserved for appeal | Preserved for some; Point II not preserved; Point II denied |
| Whether the trial court properly awarded attorneys’ fees | Contractual fee provision allows recovery of attorney fees incurred enforcing the loan documents | There was no evidence of the nature and extent of services to support the fee amount | fees awarded; court may determine within contract and without further proof |
Key Cases Cited
- Unifund CCR Partners v. Kinnamon, 384 S.W.3d 703 (Mo.App.W.D.2012) (capacity to sue challenges must be pleaded; waiver when not raised)
- City of Wellston v. SBC Commc’ns, Inc., 203 S.W.3d 189 (Mo. banc 2006) (capacity to sue defined as authority to sue)
- Hihn v. Hihn, 237 S.W.3d 607 (Mo.App.E.D.2007) (attorney-fee awards governed by applicable contract provisions, not dissolution statutes)
- Trimble v. Pracna, 167 S.W.3d 706 (Mo. banc 2005) (contractual basis for attorney fees; court must adhere to contract terms)
- Essex Contracting, Inc. v. Jefferson County, 277 S.W.3d 647 (Mo. banc 2009) (trial court presumed to know the value of services for fee awards)
- Taylor v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 854 S.W.2d 390 (Mo. banc 1993) (summary judgment proceeding treated as a trial for purposes of evidence)
- Bowman v. Prinster, 384 S.W.3d 365 (Mo.App.E.D.2012) (plain-error review rarely available in civil cases; preservation requirement)
