Ball v. Southwest Va Regional Jail-Abingdon
7:19-cv-00581
W.D. Va.Oct 17, 2019Background:
- Plaintiff Jeremy Edward Ball, a Virginia inmate, sues the Southwest Virginia Regional Jail’s medical department under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging denial of prescribed mood-stabilizing medication.
- Ball states he previously received these medications while incarcerated and that the jail has his medical records, yet now refuses to continue them.
- He seeks proper medical care and monetary relief for the alleged denial.
- The court screened the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and reviewed applicable Eighth Amendment standards for prison medical care.
- The court dismissed the action without prejudice because the medical department (a non‑corporate group) is not a “person” under § 1983 and thus is not suable; it also noted that Ball’s allegations amount to a disagreement over treatment, not deliberate indifference.
- The dismissal was without prejudice, allowing Ball to refile if he can name proper defendants and cure pleading defects.
Issues:
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the jail medical department is a "person" subject to suit under § 1983 | Ball sues the jail’s medical department as the responsible entity for denying his meds | The medical department, as a group/department, is not a suable "person" under § 1983 | Dismissed: the medical department is not a § 1983 defendant; complaint fails to state a claim against a proper defendant |
| Whether denial/refusal to provide plaintiff’s prior medications states an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim | Ball alleges denial of prescribed mood‑stabilizing meds caused harm and constituted inadequate medical care | Jail medical staff allegedly changed treatment; any difference reflects medical judgment rather than unconstitutional indifference | Dismissed: allegations show a disagreement over treatment or at most negligence, not deliberate indifference; no constitutional claim pled |
Key Cases Cited
- Cooper v. Sheehan, 735 F.3d 153 (4th Cir. 2013) (§ 1983 permits suits for constitutional violations under color of state law)
- Vinnedge v. Gibbs, 550 F.2d 926 (4th Cir. 1977) (liability under § 1983 requires personal action by defendants; entities like departments may not be "persons")
- Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170 (4th Cir. 2014) (deliberate indifference standard for prison medical claims under the Eighth Amendment)
- Russell v. Sheffer, 528 F.2d 318 (4th Cir. 1975) (medical judgment disagreements do not establish constitutional violations)
- Germain v. Shearin, [citation="531 F. App'x 392"] (4th Cir. 2013) (disagreement over medical treatment does not satisfy deliberate indifference)
- Webb v. Hamidullah, [citation="281 F. App'x 159"] (4th Cir. 2008) (negligent diagnosis or treatment alone is insufficient for an Eighth Amendment claim)
