History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baird v. Holton
806 F. Supp. 2d 53
D.D.C.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Baird seeks return of seized property (20-gauge shotgun, ammunition, and other items) seized by U.S. Capitol Police during entry into a House parking lot for an evening event.
  • Plaintiff was arrested and charged under DC law for possession of an unregistered firearm and unlawful possession of ammunition; no items were returned.
  • The seizure was conceded as lawful; plaintiff brings a Bivens claim for deprivation of property without due process of law.
  • Plaintiff pled guilty to Attempted Possession of an Unregistered Firearm; the related charge regarding ammunition was dropped; no forfeiture order was issued.
  • Plaintiff sent a request for return of property; asserts lack of notice or opportunity to challenge continued custody.
  • Court grants defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, concluding no Bivens remedy and entitlement to qualified immunity.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a Bivens claim is available for alleged deprivation of property. Baird seeks damages for due process deprivation. Rule 41(g) and existing remedies preclude Bivens. No Bivens remedy recognized.
Whether, even if a Bivens claim existed, defendant is entitled to qualified immunity. Claim involves deprivation of property without process. No clearly established right violated; proper remedies exist. Defendant entitled to qualified immunity.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (U.S. 1971) (recognizes a damages remedy against federal officers but not in all circumstances)
  • Carlson v. Green, 446 U.S. 14 (U.S. 1980) (special factors counseling hesitation re damages against federal officials)
  • Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (U.S. 1982) (qualified immunity standard for official conduct)
  • Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (U.S. 2001) (two-step approach to qualified immunity (often receded in practice))
  • Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (U.S. 2009) (modifies qualified immunity analysis to allow lower courts to decide first on the constitutional question)
  • Wilson v. Libby, 535 F.3d 697 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (recognizes special factors counseling hesitation and alternative remedies)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Baird v. Holton
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Aug 22, 2011
Citation: 806 F. Supp. 2d 53
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2010-0451
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.