History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bainbridge Limited Lp v. Dekalb County Tax Assessors
A21A1808
Ga. Ct. App.
Feb 15, 2022
Read the full case

Background

  • Bainbridge Ltd., L.P. owns Granite Crossing, a rent-restricted apartment complex developed with Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC); 74 units have below-market rents and regulatory operating requirements.
  • Construction completed after Jan. 1, 2018; 2018 assessment was $11,801,800. A hearing officer set FMV at $10,707,500; superior court bench trial followed.
  • DeKalb County appraisers (Hicks and Geoffrey Johnson) used the cost approach and Johnson concluded FMV of $14,226,785. County declined to adjust for rent restrictions or higher operating costs under the cost approach.
  • Bainbridge’s experts used the income approach: CFO Bamberger valued it at $1,000,000; Brian Walsh (VSI) gave a stabilized FMV of $3,700,000.
  • Trial court adopted the County’s cost-approach valuation, denied Bainbridge’s motion in limine to exclude Johnson, and denied Bainbridge’s request for attorney fees; appeal followed.

Issues

Issue Bainbridge’s Argument DeKalb County’s Argument Held
Whether assessors are required to apply rent limitations and higher operating costs listed in OCGA § 48-5-2(3)(B) when determining fair market value OCGA § 48-5-2(3)(B) uses mandatory language — assessors must apply those factors, so valuation must reflect them Those factors need only be considered and may not require adjustment under the cost approach; they are matters of contract or owner control, not adjustments Court: Assessors are required to apply (not merely consider) rent limits and higher operating costs; trial court’s valuation that ignored application of these factors was legal error — vacated and remanded
Whether assessors must deduct economic obsolescence for rent restrictions/higher operating costs These constraints and higher costs amount to economic obsolescence and should reduce FMV Under the cost approach such items are not external economic obsolescence but owner/contractual matters and thus need not be a deduction Court: Did not decide on economic obsolescence because reversal on statutory-application grounds made the issue unnecessary to resolve at this time
Whether trial court abused its discretion by denying motion in limine to exclude Geoffrey Johnson’s testimony Johnson’s testimony was unreliable because he did not apply the mandatory statutory factors; it should have been excluded Johnson explained his methods and data; admissibility hinges on reliability and fit, and factual omissions go to weight, not admissibility Court: No abuse of discretion — Johnson’s methodology was admissible; failure to adjust goes to credibility for the factfinder
Whether Bainbridge was entitled to attorney fees under OCGA § 48-5-311 because final valuation was ≤85% of prior valuation Final determinations by Bainbridge’s experts were ≤85% of the hearing officer’s number, so fees should be awarded The hearing officer’s valuation was excluded from trial evidence at Bainbridge’s request; without that valuation before the court, the statutory threshold cannot be measured Court: Denial affirmed — no hearing officer valuation was presented at trial, so Bainbridge did not meet statutory predicate for fees

Key Cases Cited

  • Cherokee County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Mason, 340 Ga. App. 889 (explaining appellate standards of review in tax valuation appeals)
  • SJN Properties, LLC v. Fulton County Bd. of Assessors, 296 Ga. 793 (duty to return property at fair market value and equalize assessments)
  • Heron Lake II Apartments, LP v. Lowndes County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 306 Ga. 816 (noting 2017 amendment requiring assessors shall apply rent limits/higher operating costs for Section 42 properties)
  • Leverett v. Jasper County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 233 Ga. App. 470 (trial court erred when relying on valuation performed in violation of statutory requirements)
  • Emory Univ. v. Willcox, 355 Ga. App. 542 (expert’s factual basis generally affects credibility, not admissibility)
  • White Horse Partners LLLP v. Monroe County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 348 Ga. App. 603 (trial court did not abuse discretion in admitting tax assessor expert despite memory gaps)
  • Sph Glynn, LLC v. Glynn County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 326 Ga. App. 196 (evidence from prior administrative proceedings may be admissible in superior court de novo trial)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bainbridge Limited Lp v. Dekalb County Tax Assessors
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 15, 2022
Docket Number: A21A1808
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.