History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bailey v. Fulwood
945 F. Supp. 2d 62
D.D.C.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Bailey was convicted of rape in DC Superior Court in 1994 and sentenced to 15 to 45 years.
  • He became parole-eligible on September 11, 2004, with prior parole denials in 2004 and 2007.
  • Plaintiff challenges parole decisions in 2010 and 2012.
  • USPC applied the DC Board of Parole's 1987 Regulations, not the 2000 Guidelines, in those decisions.
  • Plaintiff asserts retroactive application of parole guidelines violated the Ex Post Facto Clause; defendants move to dismiss.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Ex post facto claim viability Bailey alleges retroactive application of 2000 Guidelines increased punishment USPC applied 1987 Regulations, not retroactive Guidelines No ex post facto violation; 1987 Regulations were applied.
Authority and rationale for upward departure Departure undermines parole fairness 1987 Regulations allowed upward departure in unusual circumstances Upward departure supported by record and written factors.

Key Cases Cited

  • Garner v. Jones, 529 U.S. 244 (Supreme Court 2000) (ex post facto risk standard for retroactive guidelines)
  • Phillips v. Fulwood, 616 F.3d 577 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (upward departure under 1987 Regulations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bailey v. Fulwood
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: May 20, 2013
Citation: 945 F. Supp. 2d 62
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2012-0498
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.