History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bahman Haftsavar v. All American Carpet and Rugs, Inc. and Twin City Fire Insurance Company
59 Va. App. 593
Va. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Claimant sustained a compensable right inguinal hernia on Jan. 5, 2007 arising out of employment.
  • Pre-operative clearance on June 8, 2007 showed abnormal EKG, prompting further cardiac evaluation.
  • Cardiologist Dr. Sherber found markedly abnormal stress test on July 1, 2007 and recommended catheterization; bypass surgery followed July 5, 2007.
  • Hernia surgery occurred March 17, 2008 after claimant recovered from heart surgery; employer paid temporary disability through April 13, 2008.
  • Claimant sought payment for heart surgery costs via change-in-condition petition filed Dec. 3, 2009; deputy commissioner and later the full commission issued conflicting rulings on causation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether employer must cover treatment for a medical condition unrelated to the compensable injury. Haftsavar—heart condition unrelated to hernia injury; treatment should be compensable. Employer not responsible as no causal connection and not a compensable consequence. No; employer not responsible for the heart surgery.
Whether Papco Oil v. Farr governs this case. Papco supports compensability where treatment relates to compensable injury. Papco distinguished; here no causal link and treatment not an adjunct to hernia care. Papco does not control; denial of coverage upheld.
What is the proper test for compensability of pre-surgery medical treatment under the Act? Compensable consequences or two-causes doctrine should apply to require coverage. Adopts new causal-test that treatment unrelated to compensable injury is not covered. Court adopts a test focusing on causal connection; unrelated heart treatment precludes coverage.

Key Cases Cited

  • Papco Oil v. Farr, 26 Va. App. 66 (Va. App. 1997) (treatment of an unrelated condition may be compensable only when linked to the work injury)
  • Goad v. Lynchburg Foundry Co., 15 Va. App. 710 (Va. App. 1993) (causal relationship and necessity govern employer medical coverage)
  • Morris v. Badger Powhatan/Figgie, Int'l., Inc., 3 Va. App. 276 (Va. App. 1986) (compensable consequences doctrine applies to natural consequences of injury)
  • S. Iron Works v. Wallace, 16 Va. App. 131 (Va. App. 1993) (accelerated/ aggravated pre-existing conditions may be compensable)
  • McGregor v. Crystal Food Corp., 1 Va. App. 507 (Va. App. 1986) (burden on employee to prove medical necessity of disputed treatment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bahman Haftsavar v. All American Carpet and Rugs, Inc. and Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Feb 14, 2012
Citation: 59 Va. App. 593
Docket Number: 0873114
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.