History
  • No items yet
midpage
Badie v. State
317 Ga. App. 712
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Badie was convicted by jury of burglary of a residence.
  • Appellant challenged the denial of his directed-verdict motion and the denial of his new-trial motion based on ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • Prosecution theory relied on recent possession of stolen coins rather than eyewitness identification.
  • Evidence showed Badie near the Davises’ home within two hours of the burglary and hauling a heavy, coin-filled container.
  • Badie deposited coins at a store, received a large cash payout, and gave inconsistent ownership explanations.
  • Defense strategy focused on lack of linking physical evidence and failure to prove identity; trial court denied relief on both claims.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the evidence legally sufficient to convict for burglary? Badie argues the state failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Badie contends the circumstantial case did not exclude other reasonable hypotheses. Yes; evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the state supported guilt.
Was trial counsel ineffective for not pursuing a discrepancy about coin amounts? Badie contends counsel should have impeached Davis with police reports showing lower coin losses. Trial strategy favored by defense was reasonable; no prejudice shown. No; strategy fell within reasonable professional judgment and no reasonable probability of a different outcome.

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1979) (sufficiency standard for determining guilt beyond a reasonable doubt on direct appeal)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1984) (establishes performance and prejudice prongs for ineffective assistance claims)
  • Dorsey v. State, 279 Ga. 534 (Ga. 2005) (context for burglary and possession-based inferences in Georgia)
  • Veasley v. State, 312 Ga. App. 728 (Ga. App. 2011) (discusses sufficiency and reasonable inferences in circumstantial cases)
  • Martin v. State, 254 Ga. App. 40 (Ga. App. 2002) (evidence linking possession to burglary and credibility considerations)
  • Strickland, supra, see above (-) (reference to standard applied to ineffective assistance)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Badie v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 28, 2012
Citation: 317 Ga. App. 712
Docket Number: A12A1136
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.