History
  • No items yet
midpage
318 Neb. 891
Neb.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Sarah A. Backhaus and David R. Backhaus married in 2010 and separated in 2021; divorce proceedings followed in 2022.
  • The core dispute centers on whether funds in their jointly held savings account (account x4020) are marital or nonmarital property.
  • David received a significant inheritance during the marriage, which he claimed was the source of the funds in account x4020.
  • At trial, David testified about the origin and use of the inheritance and moved the funds to a personal account after separation; Sarah did not dispute that David received an inheritance but contested the sufficiency of his evidence tying it to account x4020.
  • The district court found account x4020 to be nonmarital and awarded it to David; the Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed, declaring the funds marital property due to insufficient evidence.
  • The Nebraska Supreme Court granted David's petition for further review and ultimately reversed the Court of Appeals, upholding the trial court's nonmarital classification of account x4020.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether funds in account x4020 are marital property David did not prove, with sufficient evidence, that the funds in account x4020 originated from his inheritance, and thus, the account should be deemed marital property and divided. David provided credible testimony that the funds in account x4020 derived from his nonmarital inheritance, so the account should be set aside as nonmarital property. David's testimony, along with circumstantial evidence, was sufficient; account x4020 is nonmarital property and belongs to David.

Key Cases Cited

  • Burgardt v. Burgardt, 304 Neb. 356 (2019) (party's credible testimony alone can suffice to establish nonmarital interest in property in divorce)
  • Stava v. Stava, 318 Neb. 32 (2024) (method of property acquisition is factual, classification as marital/nonmarital is legal)
  • Parde v. Parde, 313 Neb. 779 (2023) (trial courts must equitably distribute marital estates per Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-365)
  • Garrison v. Otto, 311 Neb. 94 (2022) (deference to trial court's factual findings in marital property division)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Backhaus v. Backhaus
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: May 9, 2025
Citations: 318 Neb. 891; 20 N.W.3d 81; S-23-845
Docket Number: S-23-845
Court Abbreviation: Neb.
Log In
    Backhaus v. Backhaus, 318 Neb. 891