History
  • No items yet
midpage
311 Ga. App. 595
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Avery was stopped for lane failure and charged with per se DUI, failure to maintain lane, and driving with a suspended license.
  • The license was suspended by Tennessee; odor of alcohol observed; Avery submitted to implied-consent breath test after arrest.
  • Avery took the State's breath test and registered 0.080 on the Intoxilyzer 5000.
  • Avery sought suppression and in limine relief arguing failure to accommodate an independent test.
  • Probate court convicted Avery of DUI and failure to maintain lane; superior court affirmed; Avery appealed.
  • Issue focused on whether the State improperly admitted the Intoxilyzer result due to Avery’s requested independent test and related proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Avery’s request for additional testing triggered independent-test rights. Avery sought additional tests; testing should be independent. Requests for additional testing were not for an independent test. No independent test requirement; State test admitted.
Whether cross-examination about the Intoxilyzer margin of error was improperly restricted. Cross-examination on margin of error should have been allowed. Question already answered; ruling harmless. Harmless error; no reversal.
Whether field sobriety tests should be excluded for lack of Miranda warnings before arrest. Field sobriety tests require Miranda warnings. No custody or arrest before completion of tests; warnings not required. No Miranda violation; tests admissible.

Key Cases Cited

  • Ladow v. State, 256 Ga.App. 726 (2002) (independent test rights when request is made; failure to obtain test limits use of State test)
  • McGinn v. State, 268 Ga.App. 450 (2004) (independent test right arises from circumstances, not mere semantics)
  • State v. Gillaspy, 270 Ga.App. Ill, 112 (2004) (circumstances surrounding request govern whether it's for an independent test)
  • Brooks v. State, 285 Ga. App. 624 (2007) (circumstances surrounding a request determine whether it is for an independent test)
  • Anderton v. State, 283 Ga.App. 493 (2007) (case on contextual evaluation of requests for independent tests)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Avery v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 7, 2011
Citations: 311 Ga. App. 595; 716 S.E.2d 729; 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2908; 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 796; A11A1340
Docket Number: A11A1340
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In
    Avery v. State, 311 Ga. App. 595