History
  • No items yet
midpage
Austell Healthcare, Inc. v. Scott
308 Ga. App. 393
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Intervenors Austell HealthCare and Travelers Indemnity sue to extinguish their subrogation lien ($59,030.02) after Scott’s third-party settlement.
  • Scott, employed by Austell HealthCare, was injured in a work-related car accident; Travelers insured his workers’ compensation.
  • Scott settled with tortfeasors for a lump sum of $76,000; he claimed not fully compensated due to disability and medical costs.
  • Trial court granted intervention to participate but later extinguished the lien and taxed $1,915 in attorney fees to intervenors.
  • Intervenors argued that a lump-sum settlement cannot show full compensation; trial court agreed they could not prove full compensation.
  • Court held there was no reversible error and affirmed in part, reversed in part on attorney fees.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether lien extinguishment was proper Scott argues complete compensation not shown by lump sum. Intervenors contend settlement can show full compensation via evidence. Lien extinguished; no reversible error shown.
Whether an evidentiary hearing was required Scott asserts hearing not required beyond record evidence. Intervenors claim mandatory hearing to prove full compensation. Not required; hearing held sufficed.
Whether intervenors had right to participate in discovery Scott—discovery not essential to proof. Intervenors should have full discovery rights. No reversible error; discovery rights limited as held.
Attorney fees award under OCGA § 9-15-14 Fees properly awarded for frivolous conduct. Fees were improper given prior rulings. Fees reversed in part; abuse of discretion identified regarding timing.
Overall propriety of the trial court’s rulings Intervenors argue misapplication of law on full compensation. Court correctly weighed evidence; supports extinguishment. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Key Cases Cited

  • City of Warner Robins v. Baker, 255 Ga.App. 601, 565 S.E.2d 919 (2002) (owner burden to show full compensation after lump-sum or verdict)
  • Paschall Truck Lines v. Kirkland, 287 Ga.App. 497, 651 S.E.2d 804 (2007) (settlement allocations uncertain; lien issues tied to full compensation)
  • North Bros. Co. v. Thomas, 236 Ga.App. 839, 513 S.E.2d 251 (1999) (settlement offsets and full indemnity considerations)
  • Gen. Elec. Membership Corp. v. Garnto, 266 Ga.App. 452, 597 S.E.2d 527 (2004) (trial court must weigh evidence to determine full compensation)
  • Intl. Maintenance Corp. v. Inland Paper Board & Packaging, 256 Ga.App. 752, 569 S.E.2d 865 (2002) (intervenor discovery rights and procedural posture)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Austell Healthcare, Inc. v. Scott
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 11, 2011
Citation: 308 Ga. App. 393
Docket Number: A10A2346
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.