History
  • No items yet
midpage
230 Cal. App. 4th 1516
Cal. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Aulisio appeals a jury verdict finding no wrongful tow or conversion of his Jeep, and CAAJ Leasing Trust owned the Jeep’s title.
  • The trial court barred CAAJ from participating, citing unauthorized practice of law if the trust were represented by a nonattorney.
  • The court substituted Aulisio as CAAJ’s trustee for purposes of the suit, but barred representation by a nonattorney for the trust.
  • The court relied on Hansen, City of Downey, and Ziegler to prohibit nonattorney trustees from appearing for trusts.
  • CAAJ and Aulisio (as trustee) were effectively excluded from the trial; the jury verdict proceeded without their participation.
  • The appellate court ultimately held that the sole settlor, trustee, and beneficiary may represent the trust in propria persona, reversing as to CAAJ and remanding for further proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
May a sole settlor-trustee-beneficiary appear in propria persona for the trust? Aulisio, as sole settlor/trustee/beneficiary, may represent the trust. Nonattorney trustees cannot appear for trusts to protect trust property. Yes, in this limited scenario the trustee may represent the trust.
Was the pretrial exclusion of CAAJ a structural error requiring reversal? CAAJ’s exclusion violated due process and the right to be heard. Preclusion did not affect the verdict against Aulisio personally. Yes, structural error requiring reversal as to CAAJ and remand.
Did the trial record show error in damages for the Jeep or its contents? Evidence of damages related to the Jeep should be considered. Record insufficient to demonstrate error; damages were not properly claimed for the Jeep. Record insufficient; no reversible error shown on this point.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hansen v. Hansen, 114 Cal.App.4th 618 (Cal.App.4th 2003) (nonattorney estate representative cannot appear for estate outside probate)
  • City of Downey v. Johnson, 263 Cal.App.2d 775 (Cal.App.2d 1968) (executor cannot defend nonprobate action in propria persona)
  • Ziegler v. Nickel, 64 Cal.App.4th 545 (Cal.App.4th 1998) (trustee cannot represent beneficiaries in court without privilege; exception for sole settlor/beneficiary)
  • C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. U.S., 818 F.2d 696 (9th Cir. 1987) (trustee who is sole beneficiary may represent self in limited context)
  • Estate of Giraldin, 55 Cal.4th 1058 (Cal. 2012) (fiduciary duties of revocable-trust trustee owed to settlor during revocable period)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Aulisio v. Bancroft
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 30, 2014
Citations: 230 Cal. App. 4th 1516; 179 Cal. Rptr. 3d 408; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 992; G048906
Docket Number: G048906
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In
    Aulisio v. Bancroft, 230 Cal. App. 4th 1516