History
  • No items yet
midpage
Attorney General Opinion No.
|
Read the full case

Background

  • KTCA imposes government liability for negligent acts of employees within scope of employment, and generally excludes independent contractors.
  • Question presented: whether a Kansas Dental Board (KDB) board member, a specialty committee member, or a paid dentist contract investigator who testifies as an expert witness in a disciplinary hearing falls within KTCA coverage.
  • KTCA defines 'employee' broadly to include officers, members, and others acting for a governmental entity in official capacity, with limited exclusions for independent contractors.
  • Right-of-control test governs whether an actor is an employee or independent contractor; case-by-case analysis; no absolute rule.
  • It is unusual and potentially problematic for a board member to serve as an expert witness in proceedings before the board, with due process concerns noted.
  • Conclusion: a KDB member who testifies as an expert may be covered by KTCA if within KDB authority; specialty committee members and paid contract investigators generally act as independent contractors and are not KTCA-covered.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are KDB board members KTCA employees? Wright contends board members act as employees for KTCA coverage. Schmidt argues board members are employees only if the statute and facts show control and official function within employment. Board members can be KTCA employees if within KDB authority and employment scope.
Does providing expert testimony as a KDB member fall within scope of employment? Wright asserts such testimony may be within KDB's authority to assist enforcement. Schmidt cautions due process concerns; status depends on statutory scope and facts. May be within scope if authorized by KDB; KTCA coverage possible.
Are members of a specialty committee KTCA employees when reviewing and testing specialty applicants but testifying as experts? Wright views them as employees during committee work; later expert testimony should be considered under KTCA. Schmidt treats such later testifiers as independent contractors when acting as expert witnesses. Specialty committee members are independent contractors when testifying as experts; not KTCA-covered.
Are paid dentist contract investigators KTCA employees when they testify as expert witnesses? Wright suggests they may be treated as employees if within KDB authority to assist prosecution. Schmidt concludes they are independent contractors and not KTCA-covered for defense/ damages. Paid contract investigators are independent contractors; not KTCA-covered.
What is the overall KTCA implication for KDB expert witnesses who are board members? Wright seeks KTCA protection for board member witnesses. Schmidt emphasizes due process risks and case-by-case analysis; scope depends on authority and facts. Board-member expert witnesses may be KTCA-covered if within authority; otherwise not, with due process caveats.

Key Cases Cited

  • Mitzner v. State Department of SRS, 257 Kan. 258 (1995) (private contractor consideration in government liability)
  • Thoman v. Farmers Bankers Life Ins. Co., 155 Kan. 806 (1942) (statutory construction and employment concepts)
  • Adams v. Marshall, 212 Kan. 595 (1973) (administrative fairness and due process principles)
  • Tziahanas v. Department of Licensing and Regulation, Board of Psychology, 371 N.W.2d 477 (1985) (impartial hearings and quasi-judicial conduct)
  • Pork Motel, Corp. v. Kansas Dept. of Health and Environment, 234 Kan. 374 (1983) (administrative agency powers and duties context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Attorney General Opinion No.
Court Name: Kansas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Sep 16, 2011
Court Abbreviation: Kan. Att'y Gen.