ATLANTIC COAST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. A.M. BEST RATING SERVICES, INC.
3:24-cv-05470
D.N.J.Jun 14, 2024Background
- Plaintiffs Atlantic Coast Life Insurance Company and Sentinel Security Life Insurance Company served a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice on Defendant A.M. Best Rating Services, Inc. ("AM Best") focused on various topics, specifically including AM Best's income from rating services for the past three years.
- The deposition is related to a pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which is scheduled for hearing on June 28, 2024.
- Plaintiffs seek to challenge AM Best’s assertion that its ratings are protected under the First Amendment by probing whether those ratings qualify as "commercial speech."
- AM Best opposes the request, arguing that its earning income from the ratings does not make the speech commercial and offered to stipulate that it earns income from ratings.
- The discovery dispute centers on whether this financial information is relevant and proportional to the needs of the preliminary injunction proceeding.
- The Court reviewed the submissions and ruled on the expedited discovery issue without oral argument.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff’s Argument | Defendant’s Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relevance of AM Best's financial data for 30(b)(6) deposition | Needed to establish ratings are commercial speech and not fully protected by First Amendment | Earning income doesn’t make speech commercial; offered to stipulate income | Plaintiffs may compel AM Best to testify on the topic |
Key Cases Cited
- Facenda v. N.F.L. Films, Inc., 542 F.3d 1007 (3d Cir. 2008) (defining factors for "commercial speech" including economic motivation)
- Bayer AG v. Betachem, Inc., 173 F.3d 188 (3d Cir. 1999) (court holds broad discretion to manage discovery)
- U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Blue Cross of Greater Phila., 898 F.2d 914 (3d Cir. 1990) (economic motivation is a key factor in analyzing commercial speech)
