History
  • No items yet
midpage
Atkinson v. GURICH
2011 OK 12
| Okla. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Atkinson challenged the 2009 fair market value of his Oklahoma County residence, seeking de novo review in district court.
  • County Assessor sought entry to inspect the home and photograph the property under 12 O.S. Supp.2008 § 3234(A)(2).
  • Atkinson sought a protective order relying on 68 O.S.2001 § 2818(C)(1) and (D), which prohibit entry absent a dispute over household personal property and taxpayer request.
  • Oklahoma County no longer taxes household personal property, affecting the statutory basis for entry.
  • Mass appraisal under 68 O.S.2001 § 2829 governs fair market value, which relies on exterior inspections and outside data rather than interior features.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
May assessor enter residential property absent dispute over household personal property? Atkinson Sullivan/Assessor No; entry is not authorized without a dispute over household personal property and taxpayer request.
Does discovery code § 3234(A)(2) override entry limits set by § 2818(C)(1)/(D)? Atkinson Assessor No; discovery code does not authorize entry when statute precludes it.
Does the Fourth Amendment/Okla. Constitution art. II, § 30 protect intrusion into a private home for tax valuation purposes? Atkinson Assessor Yes; privacy in the home prohibits entry absent statutory entitlement.

Key Cases Cited

  • Soldal v. Cook County, Ill., 506 U.S. 56 (1992) (Fourth Amendment applies to civil actions; reasonableness of searches.)
  • O'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987) (workplace searches; reasonableness standards for intrusions.)
  • New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985) (school searches; balanced reasonableness standard.)
  • Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983) (curtilage/interior search considerations; scope of police entry.)
  • Poddar v. Department of Revenue, 328 Or. 552, 983 P.2d 527 (1999) (discovery/code access balancing assessors' entry with privacy interests.)
  • Duncan v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, 2004 OK 58, 95 P.3d 1076 (OK Supreme Court 2004) (statutory limits control over discovery and intrusions.)
  • Milton v. Hayes, 1989 OK 12, 770 P.2d 14 (OK Supreme Court 1989) (statutory interpretation; precedence of specific over general statutes.)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Atkinson v. GURICH
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Feb 22, 2011
Citation: 2011 OK 12
Docket Number: 108,783
Court Abbreviation: Okla.