AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Laboratories
1:00-cv-06749
S.D.N.Y.Nov 7, 2012Background
- This is a Bill of Costs dispute in the OMEPRAZOLE MDL before the SDNY; Astraza objects to most of Mylan/Esteve's requested costs.
- Judgment was entered in 2007 in favor of Mylan/Esteve against Astra; the Federal Circuit affirmed in 2008.
- Mylan/Esteve initially sought $376,810.79 in costs; amended to $377,180.26.
- Clerk awarded $166,068.43 in August 2012; the Court then resolved remaining costs under §1920 and Local Rule 54.1.
- June 2010 Opinion standardized methodology for taxable costs; September 2010 Opinion reconciled §1920 and Local Rule costs.
- Court concludes the remaining taxable costs total $184,054.52 and directs a revised application within 30 days.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Are the remaining costs taxable under §1920 and Local Rule 54.1? | Astra asserts limited categories and need for separation by defendant. | Mylan/Esteve contends most legally taxable costs should be awarded per prior rulings. | Yes; Court taxes applicable costs under §1920 with LR 54.1 precedence and grants most items. |
| Which transcript-related costs are taxable (trial and depositions)? | All designated/transcribed materials used in evidence should be taxable. | Some items (minuscripts, Real Time, etc.) are not taxable. | Original trial transcripts and deposition exhibits taxable; minuscripts and nonessential Real Time fees denied; exhibit fees taxable. |
| Are overseas deposition travel costs taxable? | Travel costs to foreign depositions should be taxable as authorized by Court orders. | Counsel travel costs are attorney fees, not taxable. | Denied; overseas counsel travel costs treated as non-taxable attorney fees. |
| Are photocopying and miscellaneous exhibit/document costs taxable? | Copying costs for discovered documents should be taxable if reasonably incurred. | Only copies for exhibits used or received should be taxed; broader copying costs disputed. | Taxable at limited scope: $230 for exhibit copies; $29,104.20 for discovery photocopies; misc. demonstrative equipment taxed; post-trial briefs not taxable. |
Key Cases Cited
- Dattner v. Conagra Foods, Inc., 458 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2006) (authority on prevailing-party costs entitlement and framework for scrutiny of costs)
- Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck, & Co., 191 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 1999) (discretion in costs decisions under Rule 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1920)
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co., 379 U.S. 227 (1964) (discretion in taxing costs and sparing use of those costs not specifically allowed by statute)
- Evergreen Pipeline Constr. Co., Inc. v. Merritt Meridian Constr. Corp., 95 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 1996) (photocopying costs may be taxable with documentation of necessity and amounts)
