History
  • No items yet
midpage
2021 Ark. App. 94
Ark. Ct. App.
2021
Read the full case

Background

  • On August 21, 2019 the circuit court entered a default judgment against Ascentium Capital, LLC for $600,185.
  • John Bolton was a named but unserved codefendant; the circuit court dismissed Bolton in December 2019.
  • Ascentium filed its sole notice of appeal within 30 days of the December dismissal, but not within 30 days of the August default judgment.
  • Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b)(5) operates to dismiss claims against named but unserved defendants when a final adjudication is entered, making the August default judgment final and appealable.
  • Ascentium filed a Rule 55(c) motion to set aside the default judgment in January 2020; that motion has not been adjudicated.
  • The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction as untimely and explained the Rule 55(c) motion was unadjudicated (so the merits review was premature); the court gave no opinion on the motion’s merits.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Finality/timeliness of appeal under Rule 54(b)(5) The August default judgment was final by operation of Rule 54(b)(5); Ascentium’s notice of appeal was untimely. The December 2019 dismissal of Bolton made that order the final appealable decision, so Ascentium’s appeal was timely. The August default judgment was the final, appealable order by operation of Rule 54(b)(5); the appeal was untimely and dismissed.
Effect of Ascentium’s Rule 55(c) motion to set aside The unadjudicated motion means appellate review of the default is premature. Ascentium argued the motion warranted vacatur and should affect the appeal (or be deemed denied). The Rule 55(c) motion was not decided; it was not within 10 days so the "deemed denied" rule did not apply; appellate review of the motion’s merits is premature.

Key Cases Cited

  • S. Dev. Corp. v. Freightliner of New Hampshire, Inc., 307 S.W.3d 597 (Ark. App. 2009) (Rule 54(b)(5) operates to dismiss claims against named but unserved defendants and cures related jurisdictional defects)
  • Epting v. Precision Paint & Glass, Inc., 110 S.W.3d 747 (Ark. 2003) (no filing deadline exists for a Rule 55(c) motion to set aside a default judgment)
  • Sevenprop Assocs. v. Harrison, 746 S.W.2d 51 (Ark. 1988) (default judgment is appealable when damages are determined and amount is reduced to dollars and cents)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ascentium Capital, LLC v. James Marshall, Individually and Doing Business as Your Furniture Store
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date Published: Mar 3, 2021
Citation: 2021 Ark. App. 94
Court Abbreviation: Ark. Ct. App.
Log In
    Ascentium Capital, LLC v. James Marshall, Individually and Doing Business as Your Furniture Store, 2021 Ark. App. 94