History
  • No items yet
midpage
537 F.Supp.3d 1282
N.D. Ala.
2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Ascent Hospitality owned hotels/restaurants insured under an "all-risks" Wausau policy that covers losses caused by "direct physical loss or damage"; policy includes a Contamination Exclusion defining "contaminant" to include viruses.
  • In March 2020 Ascent alleged COVID-19 was present on its properties and that state ‘‘stay-at-home’’ orders and the virus’s presence forced closures, causing >$40 million in losses.
  • Ascent submitted a claim; defendants issued a Reservation of Rights within 48 hours and denied the claim in April 2020. Ascent amended its complaint asserting breach of contract, declaratory relief, bad faith, fraudulent misrepresentation, and fraudulent suppression.
  • Prior to this motion the court dismissed several claims against Liberty and limited fraud claims; remaining claims included breach, declaratory relief, bad faith, and fraud against Wausau and a fraud claim against Liberty.
  • Defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings; the court accepted Ascent’s factual allegations as true for the Rule 12(c) posture.
  • The court concluded (as a matter of law) the policy does not cover COVID-19 losses and the Contamination Exclusion applies, and therefore dismissed all remaining claims with prejudice.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether "direct physical loss or damage" includes loss of use from virus contamination or government closures "Physical loss or damage" includes property rendered unusable by a virus or by government closure orders Phrase requires tangible, physical alteration or actual damage; mere presence of virus or loss of use is not "physical loss" The term requires an actual physical change/alteration; cleaning/disinfection (or closure orders) do not constitute "repair/replace"able physical loss — no coverage
Whether the policy's Contamination Exclusion bars recovery for COVID-19 losses Exclusion targets traditional environmental/industrial pollution and should not be read to bar pandemic losses Exclusion expressly defines "contaminant" to include viruses; contamination from COVID-19 is excluded unless it "directly resulted from a covered loss" Contamination Exclusion applies because COVID-19 is a defined contaminant and was the alleged cause of loss; exclusion bars coverage
Choice of law: enforceability of New York choice-of-law provision New York choice-of-law provision is unenforceable; Georgia law should govern breach claim Policy contains an enforceable New York choice-of-law provision Ascent waived the argument by not timely challenging the provision; court also noted result is the same under New York or Georgia law
Viability of tort claims (bad faith, fraudulent misrepresentation) given denial Denial, inadequate investigation, and reservation of rights support bad faith and fraud claims No coverage exists; therefore bad faith (which requires a covered loss) fails; representations about prompt payment were not false given a reasonable coverage denial Bad faith dismissed (no covered loss); fraudulent misrepresentation dismissed because denial was justified and statements were not shown to be false

Key Cases Cited

  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) (pleading standard requires plausibility)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) (pleading standards; legal conclusions vs. factual allegations)
  • Roundabout Theatre Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., 751 N.Y.S.2d 4 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002) (interpreting "direct physical loss or damage" to require physical damage for business-interruption coverage)
  • Mama Jo’s, Inc. v. Sparta Ins. Co., [citation="823 F. App'x 868"] (11th Cir. 2020) ("direct physical loss" requires actual physical loss; cleaning restores property and does not qualify)
  • Olin Corp. v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 704 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2012) (contract terms should be read to avoid surplusage)
  • AFLAC, Inc. v. Chubb & Sons, Inc., 581 S.E.2d 317 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003) (Georgia precedent treating "direct physical loss or damage" as requiring actual physical change)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ascent Hospitality Management Co LLC v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Date Published: May 5, 2021
Citations: 537 F.Supp.3d 1282; 2:20-cv-00770
Docket Number: 2:20-cv-00770
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ala.
Log In