History
  • No items yet
midpage
174 So. 3d 491
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Homeowners (Cardona and Palomino) appealed a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Nationstar Mortgage, LLC.
  • Nationstar amended its complaint alleging it was the holder of the promissory note and attached the same mortgage, note, and allonge from the original complaint, plus a corporate assignment dated June 27, 2012.
  • Nationstar filed a "Certification as to Original Promissory Note" stating it possessed the original note as of September 21, 2013.
  • At a non-jury trial, Nationstar called an employee who began working for Nationstar in January 2014; he never worked for the predecessor bank and learned about the loan solely by reviewing Nationstar’s business records stored in FileNet.
  • The employee testified about possession of the note, default, payment history, and payoff figures based on those business records; the homeowners objected as hearsay because the underlying records were not admitted.
  • The trial court overruled objections and entered judgment for Nationstar. The Fourth District reversed, concluding the employee’s testimony was inadmissible absent admission of the business records he relied on.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a witness may testify about the contents of a lender's business records not admitted into evidence Testimony was admissible because the witness had personal knowledge from reviewing the records Testimony inadmissible because witness's knowledge derived solely from records not introduced Reversed: testimony inadmissible unless the business records are first admitted into evidence
Whether Nationstar proved standing to foreclose by showing possession of the note when complaint filed Nationstar asserted it possessed the original note and filed a certification to that effect Homeowners argued Nationstar failed to prove possession because the employee relied only on unadmitted records Issue rendered moot by reversal on evidentiary error

Key Cases Cited

  • Cayea v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 138 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (standard of appellate review for evidentiary rulings)
  • Sas v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n, 112 So. 3d 778 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (trial court erred admitting testimony about servicer's records without admitting the records)
  • Beauchamp v. Bank of N.Y., 150 So. 3d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (remand required where witness testified about debt based on unadmitted records)
  • Bank of N.Y. v. Calloway, 157 So. 3d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (reversed where trial court failed to admit business records relied upon by witness)
  • Hayes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 933 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (cited for appellate review standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Arturo Cardona and Aida Palomino v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 19, 2015
Citations: 174 So. 3d 491; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12482; 2015 WL 4931354; 4D14-1609
Docket Number: 4D14-1609
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    Arturo Cardona and Aida Palomino v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, 174 So. 3d 491