History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arken v. City of Portland
263 P.3d 975
Or.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • PERS is a public pension system; PERB administers PERF and sets credits, reserves, and rates.
  • Window Retirees (Tier One, Money Match) retired 2000–2004 and were overpaid based on 1999 20% earnings credit.
  • Legislation in 2003 (HB 2003) codified an 11.33% 1999 credit and imposed a COLA adjustment scheme; it also created Section 14b for recovery of overpayments.
  • PERB issued January 27, 2006 Order Adopting Repayment Methods to recover overpayments under ORS 238.715, using lump-sum or actuarial reductions, with COLAs potentially frozen.
  • Strunk (2005) invalidated COLA suspension under the 2003 reform as a contract breach, influencing later decisions; City of Eugene cases guided the overpayment recovery framework.
  • Arken and Robinson challenge PERB’s methods; the Court resolves whether 238.715 and 14b apply and what remedies are permissible.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether ORS 238.715 applies to Window Retirees after 2003 reforms Arken: 238.715 barred by Strunk/Section 10 Arken: 14b/10/Section 10 preclude 238.715 238.715 applicable to recover overpayments.
Whether 2003 reform eliminated PERB's 238.715 authority Arken: reforms extinguish 238.715 Arken: authority preserved by omission/history Legislature did not intend to eliminate 238.715.
Whether 14b COLA freeze is a valid remedy Arken/Robinson: COLA freeze valid under 14b PERB: 14b COLA freeze necessary COLA freeze under 14b invalid; not a viable remedy.
Whether the 14b remedies are exclusive or can coexist with 238.715 Robinson/PERB: 14b exclusive 14b separate, nonredundant 14b remedies not exclusive; 238.715 remains available.

Key Cases Cited

  • Strunk v. PERB, 338 Or. 145 (2005) (invalidated COLA suspension as contract breach; informs limits on COLA provisions)
  • City of Eugene v. PERB, 339 Or. 113 (2005) (addressed overpayment recoupment and reserves; influenced 14b/10)
  • City of Eugene v. PERB, 341 Or. 120 (2006) (mootness/settlement; reaffirmed reach of 14b issues)
  • Hughes v. State of Oregon, 314 Or. 1 (1992) (promissory contract rights in PERS; trust/contract framework)
  • Gaines v. State, 346 Or. 160 (2009) (statutory interpretation; legislature intent governs contracts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Arken v. City of Portland
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 6, 2011
Citation: 263 P.3d 975
Docket Number: CC 060100536; SC S058881; CC 060504584; SC S058882
Court Abbreviation: Or.