Arch Coal Group, Inc. v. David Woolum
25-ica-91
| Intermediate Court of Appeals ... | Aug 29, 2025Background
- David Woolum, with over forty years of coal mining experience, was diagnosed with coal workers' pneumoconiosis, restrictive lung disease, and chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure.
- Woolum's lung function had declined, requiring oxygen therapy as documented by multiple physicians, including Dr. Craig and the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board (OP Board).
- Woolum also had a history of COVID-19 pneumonia and was assessed for sarcoidosis, complicating his respiratory issues.
- The claim administrator twice denied coverage for oxygen therapy and related equipment, arguing the ongoing respiratory issues were not linked to occupational pneumoconiosis.
- The Workers’ Compensation Board of Review reversed these denials, authorizing oxygen therapy and equipment; Arch Coal, Inc. appealed this decision to the Intermediate Court of Appeals.
- The appellate court reviewed whether the Board erred in authorizing these medical devices and therapy as compensable treatments under the claim.
Issues
| Issue | Woolum's Argument | Arch Coal's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authorization of oxygen therapy and equipment for pneumoconiosis | Oxygen therapy is medically required due to progression of occupational pneumoconiosis; medical evidence supports need | Medical evidence is insufficient; impairment is equally due to occupational and non-occupational causes, including COVID-19 | Affirmed Board’s order authorizing therapy; substantial evidence supports need due to occupational pneumoconiosis |
Key Cases Cited
- Duff v. Kanawha Cnty. Comm’n, 250 W. Va. 510, 905 S.E.2d 528 (W. Va. 2024) (standards for appellate review of Board of Review decisions)
- In re Queen, 196 W. Va. 442, 473 S.E.2d 483 (W. Va. 1996) (deferential review of agency decisions supported by substantial evidence)
- Delbert v. Murray American Energy, Inc., 247 W. Va. 367, 880 S.E.2d 89 (W. Va. 2022) (guidance on authorization for oxygen therapy in workers’ compensation claims)
