History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. v. McRae
292 Ga. 243
| Ga. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • McRae sustained a February 2006 work injury and employer accepted the claim, paying benefits.
  • McRae signed a medical release form; treating physician later opined MMI and 65% PPD.
  • Arby’s sought an ex parte conference with the treating physician; physician refused without McRae or counsel present.
  • Board ordered McRae to sign a release expressly authorizing private meeting with employer/insurer representatives; McRae refused, hearing was removed.
  • Courts below split; Court of Appeals reversed the Board, holding OCGA § 34-9-207(a) does not support ex parte communications.
  • This Court held that OCGA § 34-9-207(a) waives privilege for information related to the claim and permits informal ex parte physician-employer communications, with privacy protections.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether OCGA § 34-9-207(a) waives physician-patient privilege McRae argued no ex parte access. Arby’s argued waiver allows information disclosure. Waiver applies to information related to the claim.
Whether ex parte physician-employer communications are permissible Waived privilege should prohibit ex parte talks. Ex parte conversations are permissible if related to the injury and privacy protected. Informal ex parte communications are permissible to the extent confidentiality is waived.
Role of HIPAA and state law in allowing ex parte communications HIPAA/privacy may restrict communications. HIPAA does not preempt Georgia law; state workers’ comp favors disclosure. HIPAA does not preempt; state statute controls in this context.

Key Cases Cited

  • McRae v. Arby’s Restaurant Group, 313 Ga. App. 313 ((2011)) (discusses statutory interpretation of waiver and ex parte communications)
  • Baker v. Wellstar Health Systems, 288 Ga. 336 ((2010)) (medical privacy rights and HIPAA interaction with state law)
  • Doss v. Food Lion, 267 Ga. 312 ((1996)) (workers’ comp exclusive remedy and disclosure policy)
  • Ogden v. Clark Thread Co., 93 Ga. App. 227 ((1956)) (expeditious determination of workers’ compensation claims)
  • Six Flags Over Ga. II v. Kull, 276 Ga. 210 ((2003)) (plain language interpretation governs statutory construction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. v. McRae
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 5, 2012
Citation: 292 Ga. 243
Docket Number: S12G0714
Court Abbreviation: Ga.