History
  • No items yet
midpage
Appeal of Town of Deerfield
34 A.3d 734
N.H.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • On March 24, 2010, NEPBA petitioned to represent Deerfield police department employees for a bargaining unit of ten employees (six full-time officers, two part-time officers, a corporal, and the secretary).
  • Town objected, arguing the unit did not meet the ten-employee minimum because the on-call status of one part-time officer, the corporal, and the secretary rendered them improper members of the unit.
  • On July 27, 2010, a hearing officer granted certification; Town reviewed the decision on August 13, 2010; PELRB denied review; Town rehearing was denied; on October 22, 2010 PELRB certified the unit as proposed.
  • The parties and court acknowledge RSA 541:13 standard of review and that PELRB findings are presumptively lawful unless shown otherwise; ultimate statutory interpretation is de novo.
  • Governing statute RSA 273-A:8 I generally requires a ten-employee unit absent prior governing body approval; certain employees may be excluded from counting; on-call status can affect counting for certification purposes.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does counting an on-call, part-time officer comply with the ten-employee rule? Petitioner argues the unit's 'snapshot' includes the officer as of certification, satisfying the count. Town argues on-call status means no regular shift, thus the officer should not be counted toward ten. Counting on-call employee improper; ten-member requirement not satisfied.
Must the ten-employee minimum exist at the time of certification, per RSA 273-A:8 I? Certification can occur if ten existed when petition was filed and authorization cards were examined. Statute requires the unit to contain ten employees absent prior approval; counting cannot be postponed. Plain meaning requires at least ten employees in the certified unit; PELRB erred.

Key Cases Cited

  • Appeal of Town of Conway, 121 N.H. 372 (1981) (ten-employee minimum; prior approval requirement)
  • Appeal of Town of Litchfield, 147 N.H. 416 (2002) (ten-employee counting; proper scope of unit)
  • Appeal of Univ. System of N.H. Bd. of Trustees, 147 N.H. 626 (2002) (statutory interpretation; deference to PELRB limits)
  • Appeal of Town of Stratham, 144 N.H. 429 (1999) (unit size and certification principles)
  • Appeal of State Employees’ Assoc. of N.H., 156 N.H. 507 (2007) (statutory interpretation; role of final arbiter)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Appeal of Town of Deerfield
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Oct 27, 2011
Citation: 34 A.3d 734
Docket Number: No. 2010-764
Court Abbreviation: N.H.