History
  • No items yet
midpage
Appeal of Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource Energy
165 A.3d 695
| N.H. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • PSNH (Eversource) appealed BTLA denials of tax abatements for 86 municipal assessments of utility property for tax years 2011–2012; consolidated eight-day BTLA hearing; appeal to New Hampshire Supreme Court.
  • PSNH owns generation/transmission assets (hydro and fossil) and is PUC-regulated; both PSNH and DRA (state) submitted unit-method appraisals valuing the utility as a whole then allocating to towns.
  • PSNH offered appraisals/testimony from Tegarden and DRA appraiser Dickman (and rebuttal expert Heaton); municipalities offered multiple assessor experts (Sansoucy, Roberge, Smith, Corcoran/Hurley) using cost (RCNLD), sales comparison, and income approaches.
  • BTLA granted 9 abatements but denied the remainder, finding Tegarden’s and Dickman’s appraisals not credible and concluding PSNH failed to prove municipal assessments disproportional; BTLA declined to resolve many methodological criticisms because methodology alone cannot establish disproportionality.
  • PSNH appealed arguing (1) BTLA wrongly rejected Tegarden/DRA appraisals and failed to account for regulation, (2) BTLA treated its challenges as merely methodological, (3) estoppel should bar municipalities from assessing above DRA values, and (4) constitutional/statutory uniformity and proportionality violations.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether BTLA erred in rejecting Tegarden and DRA unit-method appraisals PSNH: appraisals credible; regulation limits buyers to NBV; unit method previously accepted Municipalities: appraisals flawed in assumptions, income and cost approaches, allocations, and appraiser qualifications Court: Affirmed BTLA — its factual findings rejecting those appraisals are supported by record; regulation did not compel NBV result and unit appraisals had specific defects
Whether PSNH proved municipal assessments were disproportional (vs. merely methodological critiques) PSNH: methodological critiques + expert testimony showed assessments exceeded market value Municipalities: flaws in methodology do not, by themselves, prove disproportionality; BTLA credited municipal experts Court: Affirmed — PSNH failed to meet burden to show disproportionate taxation; BTLA permissibly treated many criticisms as methodological only
Whether judicial or quasi‑estoppel bars municipalities from assessing above DRA equalized values PSNH: municipalities implicitly accepted DRA values and should be estopped from taking contrary local positions Municipalities/DRA: DRA equalization is not a litigated position by towns; towns report local values and DRA may substitute its own allocations Court: Estoppel doctrines inapplicable — DRA process is not a party-litigation position and towns did not take inconsistent legal positions; quasi‑estoppel not shown
Whether differing local vs. DRA assessments violate state constitutional/statutory uniformity and proportionality PSNH: municipalities taxing at higher local values than DRA equalization causes disproportionate tax burden Municipalities: each taxing district must value property uniformly within the district; PSNH pays same proportion as other municipal taxpayers Court: No constitutional/statutory violation — constitutional test concerns proportion within the taxing district; any disparity with DRA statewide allocation does not show PSNH pays more than its local proportional share

Key Cases Cited

  • Porter v. Town of Sanbornton, 150 N.H. 363 (2003) (taxpayer bears burden to show assessment disproportional by showing higher percentage of fair market value)
  • Appeal of Pennichuck Water Works, 160 N.H. 18 (2010) (utility valuation methods and deference to trier of fact; multiple valuation approaches acceptable)
  • Appeal of Public Serv. Co. of N.H., 124 N.H. 479 (1984) (if regulation so restrictive that purchaser limited to NBV, NBV may equal market value)
  • Town of Charlestown, 166 N.H. 498 (2014) (BTLA findings prima facie lawful; standard of review)
  • Appeal of City of Nashua, 138 N.H. 261 (1994) (constitutional mandate that taxpayers be assessed at the same proportion of fair market value within a town)
  • Stevens v. City of Lebanon, 122 N.H. 29 (1982) (abatement test is whether taxpayer pays more than proportional share of taxes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Appeal of Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource Energy
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 2, 2017
Citation: 165 A.3d 695
Docket Number: 2015-0626
Court Abbreviation: N.H.