History
  • No items yet
midpage
830 N.W.2d 93
S.D.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • This is the second SD Supreme Court appeal about Butte County Director of Equalization’s method for valuing Apland’s rangeland for 2002–2003.
  • Apland argued the use of sales with appurtenant water rights without adjusting for water-right value violated equality and uniformity.
  • The Court in Apland I held the Director failed to reflect value of BFID water rights and remanded to adjust downward for water rights before assessing median value.
  • On remand, Director used a paired-sales method with a 48% downward adjustment for water rights when measuring irrigated vs non-irrigated land.
  • The trial court found Director hadn’t complied with Apland I, but the SD Supreme Court reverses in part and remands for intra-neighborhood equality/uniformity assessment.
  • SDCL 10-6-33.6 governed “neighborhooding” procedures at the time, though later repealed in 2008.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Director properly followed Apland I directives on remand Apland argues Director failed to ensure equality/uniformity within neighborhoods Director contends adjustments for water rights and 10-6-33.6 compliance were satisfied Partially: Director followed core directives but intra-neighborhood equality remains to be shown.
whether 10-6-33.6 neighborhood establishment was justified after water-right adjustments Apland asserts neighborhoods not uniform after adjustments Director claims deviation >10% warrants separate values Remanded to determine equality/uniformity within neighborhoods.

Key Cases Cited

  • Apland v. Butte Cnty. (Apland I), 2006 S.D. 53 (2006) (held Director must adjust for appurtenant water rights before median value)
  • Butte Cnty. v. Vallery, 602 N.W.2d 284 (1999 S.D.) (presumption of proper official action; burden on taxpayer to show excess, lack of uniformity, or discrimination)
  • Burke v. Butte Cnty., 640 N.W.2d 473 (2002 S.D.) (tax appeals; burden-shifting and evidentiary standards)
  • Stehly v. Davison Cnty., 802 N.W.2d 899 (2011 S.D.) (de novo standard for constitutional/property tax questions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Apland v. Board of Equalization
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 10, 2013
Citations: 830 N.W.2d 93; 2013 S.D. 33; 2013 S.D. LEXIS 33; 2013 SD 33; 2013 WL 1460409; 26196
Docket Number: 26196
Court Abbreviation: S.D.
Log In
    Apland v. Board of Equalization, 830 N.W.2d 93