Angelique Teresa Shelley v. Commonwealth of Virginia
2019153
Va. Ct. App.Dec 6, 2016Background
- Shelley was convicted in the Circuit Court of Amherst County of three counts of distributing a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of school property under Va. Code § 18.2-255.2(A)(2).
- The controlled-substance sale occurred at a picnic table located at the exterior corner of a motel, about 100 yards (≈300 feet) from a school.
- The picnic table sat in a grassy area between the motel and a U-Haul dealership, adjacent to the motel parking lot and without fences or gates around it.
- A “No Trespassing” sign existed at the motel night check-in window, but there was no evidence the sign applied to the picnic table area or that the sign was posted where the table sat.
- Law enforcement had observed people use the picnic table on other occasions and testified the public was not typically refused access unless previously barred; officers had a clear view of the table from about 45 yards away.
- Shelley argued the picnic table was not "open to public use" because she and the buyer were motel guests and because of the motel’s trespass policy and past removals.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the picnic table was "property open to public use" under § 18.2-255.2(A)(2) | Shelley: table was effectively private because she and buyer were motel guests and motel had trespass signage/enforcement | Commonwealth: table was readily accessible to the public; signs did not show the table was restricted; people used it at times and could access it without challenge | Court affirmed: picnic table was "open to public use" because it was readily accessible and the public would not reasonably anticipate being challenged |
Key Cases Cited
- Fullwood v. Commonwealth, 279 Va. 531 (2010) (upholding finding that privately owned apartment parking lot was "open to public use" where accessible despite some "No Trespassing" signs)
- Smith v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 620 (1998) (private business across from a school was "open to public use" where location was accessible and not blocked)
- Commonwealth v. Burns, 240 Va. 171 (1990) (statute’s aggravating factor applies to any drug transaction within 1,000 feet of a school regardless of whether children actually congregate there)
