Angelica Renee Gray v. State, 02-16-00403-CR

In 2009 Angelica Renee Gray pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon (second-degree felony) and received six years’ deferred-adjudication community supervision.
The trial court extended her community supervision in 2015 and again in 2016.
On May 24, 2016 the State filed a petition to proceed to adjudication alleging Gray committed a new aggravated assault, unlawfully possessed a firearm away from her home, and used the controlled substance marijuana.
Gray pleaded not true to the aggravated-assault and firearm allegations but pleaded true to the controlled-substance allegation.
The trial court found true the possession and controlled-substance allegations, adjudicated Gray guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and sentenced her to 12 years’ confinement.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument (Gray)	Defendant's Argument (State)	Held
Whether revocation was an abuse of discretion because evidence was insufficient to prove possession of a firearm away from Gray's residence	Trial court erred; evidence did not prove possession away from home	A single proven violation supports revocation; evidence supported allegations	Court affirmed: revocation upheld because Gray pleaded true to illegal drug use, which alone supports revocation

Rickels v. State, 202 S.W.3d 759 (Tex. Crim. App.) (abuse-of-discretion standard for revocation review)
Cardona v. State, 665 S.W.2d 492 (Tex. Crim. App.) (review evidence in light most favorable to trial court)
Cobb v. State, 851 S.W.2d 871 (Tex. Crim. App.) (State must prove violation by preponderance in revocation)
Garrett v. State, 619 S.W.2d 172 (Tex. Crim. App.) (trial court as sole judge of witness credibility)
Garcia v. State, 387 S.W.3d 20 (Tex. Crim. App.) (single violation is sufficient to revoke supervision)
Moore v. State, 605 S.W.2d 924 (Tex. Crim. App.) (supporting precedent that one violation suffices)
Cole v. State, 578 S.W.2d 127 (Tex. Crim. App.) (a plea of true to one allegation alone supports revocation)