Andron Deshawn Petteway v. State of Texas
11-11-00148-CR
Tex. App.May 30, 2013Background
- Appellant pled guilty to possession of cocaine in a drug-free zone under a plea bargain; punishment fixed at seven years’ confinement.
- Appellant appeals the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence obtained via a search warrant.
- Officer Jaimes executed a warrant on Appellant’s residence based on information from a confidential informant.
- The probable cause affidavit asserted the informant was credible, reliable, had previously supplied true information, and observed Appellant with cocaine within 48 hours of issuance.
- The court reviews the magistrate’s probable cause determination under a deferential standard and held the warrant supported probable cause.
- The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the informant-based probable cause supported the warrant | Petteway argues informant credibility was lacking | State contends affidavit established reliability and nexus | Probable cause found; warrant valid |
Key Cases Cited
- Avery v. State, 545 S.W.2d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977) (informant reliability may be established by prior reliability without corroboration)
- Capistran v. State, 759 S.W.2d 121 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982) (informant reliability can be asserted by general statements of prior reliability)
- Torres v. State, 552 S.W.2d 821 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977) (informant credibility can be based on past proven information)
- Rodriguez v. State, 232 S.W.3d 55 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (probable cause is evaluated with totality of circumstances)
- Gates v. Illinois, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) (flexible, commonsensical standard for probable cause)
- McLain v. State, 337 S.W.3d 268 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (review of warrant probable cause under deference to magistrate; four-corners rule)
- Hankins v. State, 132 S.W.3d 380 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (affirmative deferential standard for magistrate’s decision to issue a warrant)
- Duarte v. State, 389 S.W.3d 349 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (first-time informant corroboration considerations)
